From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: danny.backx@scarlet.be
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Patch : gdbserver get_image_name on CE
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907011953.32584.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246473648.15871.201.camel@pavilion>
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 19:40:48, Danny Backx wrote:
> I am certain that this happens when you create an executable which
> attempts to get an API from a DLL by name, if the API happens not to be
> in the DLL.
>
> You'll probably need to read that five times to understand it :-)
Nope, I got it the first time. :-)
>
> If the development environment is wrong in this way :
> - a .def file was used to create a .dll.a file
> - the .def file implements an api that's not actually in the DLL
>
> This could be due to
> - an invalid .def file
> - a .def file that's valid for one distribution of WinCE but not for
> another (read: differences between CE versions)
>
> Anyway. What happens is the executable appears to start (CreateProcess
> returns valid results), then the loader kicks in and fails. This is
> where I have verified that you will get this result.
>
> Furthermore : none of the debug API's work either, gdbserver really gets
> not a single sensible signal from the underlying process.
>
What I was interested in knowing, was if loading a similarly faulty
dll (not the main executable) triggers the same issue. Both in the
case where the app is "linked" to it (gcc -o foo foo.c -lbaddll) ---
I expect so, and in the case where LoadLibrary is used to pull in a
bad dll. If the latter case triggers the same "lost connection to
inferior" error, then you have yourself a kernel bug.
You'll probably need to read that five times to understand it :-)
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-13 14:29 Danny Backx
2009-06-13 18:05 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-13 18:08 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14 8:35 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 13:56 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14 8:47 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 9:48 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 14:23 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-21 9:50 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-30 21:07 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-30 21:56 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-01 18:41 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 18:52 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-07-01 19:12 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 20:12 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-04 18:14 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-08 9:55 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-08 11:34 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-27 20:40 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 19:31 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 14:34 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14 14:05 ` Pedro Alves
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-07 9:18 Danny Backx
2009-06-07 17:03 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-07 18:02 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-07 18:15 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-07 19:13 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-07 19:28 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-08 18:13 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-12 22:18 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-13 6:28 ` Johnny Willemsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907011953.32584.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=danny.backx@scarlet.be \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox