Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: danny.backx@scarlet.be
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Patch : gdbserver get_image_name on CE
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907011953.32584.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246473648.15871.201.camel@pavilion>

On Wednesday 01 July 2009 19:40:48, Danny Backx wrote:
> I am certain that this happens when you create an executable which
> attempts to get an API from a DLL by name, if the API happens not to be
> in the DLL.
> 
> You'll probably need to read that five times to understand it :-)

Nope, I got it the first time.  :-)

> 
> If the development environment is wrong in this way :
> - a .def file was used to create a .dll.a file
> - the .def file implements an api that's not actually in the DLL
> 
> This could be due to 
> - an invalid .def file
> - a .def file that's valid for one distribution of WinCE but not for
>   another (read: differences between CE versions)
> 
> Anyway. What happens is the executable appears to start (CreateProcess
> returns valid results), then the loader kicks in and fails. This is
> where I have verified that you will get this result. 
> 
> Furthermore : none of the debug API's work either, gdbserver really gets
> not a single sensible signal from the underlying process.
> 

What I was interested in knowing, was if loading a similarly faulty
dll (not the main executable) triggers the same issue.  Both in the
case where the app is "linked" to it (gcc -o foo foo.c -lbaddll) ---
I expect so, and in the case where LoadLibrary is used to pull in a
bad dll.  If the latter case triggers the same "lost connection to
inferior" error, then you have yourself a kernel bug.

You'll probably need to read that five times to understand it :-)

-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-01 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-13 14:29 Danny Backx
2009-06-13 18:05 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-13 18:08   ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14  8:35     ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 13:56       ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14  8:47   ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14  9:48     ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 14:23       ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-21  9:50         ` Danny Backx
2009-06-30 21:07           ` Danny Backx
2009-06-30 21:56             ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-01 18:41               ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 18:52                 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-07-01 19:12                   ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 20:12                 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-04 18:14                   ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-08  9:55                     ` Danny Backx
2009-07-08 11:34                       ` Danny Backx
2009-07-27 20:40                         ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 19:31               ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 14:34       ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14 14:05     ` Pedro Alves
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-07  9:18 Danny Backx
2009-06-07 17:03 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-07 18:02   ` Danny Backx
2009-06-07 18:15     ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-07 19:13       ` Danny Backx
2009-06-07 19:28         ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-08 18:13           ` Danny Backx
2009-06-12 22:18       ` Danny Backx
2009-06-13  6:28         ` Johnny Willemsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200907011953.32584.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=danny.backx@scarlet.be \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox