Re: Patch : gdbserver get_image_name on CE

[Danny Backx <danny.backx@scarlet.be>]

On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 20:29 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Sunday 07 June 2009 20:12:47, Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 19:16 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > It's fine to send unfinished patches for comments, if you'd like, but
> > > please say so explicitly, so I don't waste time trying to understand
> > > what they're for, for nothing.
> > 
> > This one isn't for nothing, it fixes a problem. 
> 
> Sorry, you missed my point.  "for nothing" refered to my waste of time,
> not to the usefulness of the patch.  Please do realize that if you don't
> explain what the patch does, than whoever reviews it has to stare
> at the code and try to make some sense of it.  If the patch
> isn't obvious (this one isn't obvious to me), and doesn't
> come with explanations, it is not going to be applied.  The onus
> is on you to make it as easy as possible for a reviewer/maintainer to
> accept a patch.  I really do not mean to sound harsh.  It is just
> that it is easy to not realise that it does take time to review
> a patch, and the backlog isn't getting shorter...
> 
> > It's just not all of the 
> > work to get gdb/gdbserver to work for x86/ce .
> 
> I understand.
> 
> On Sunday 07 June 2009 20:12:47, Danny Backx wrote:
> > CE -> unicode, both ARM and x86.
> > The DLL name was in the right place, it's just the code to read it
> > didn't work right.
> 
> It's the explanation of what's wrong with it that's missing.

Ok, thanks for pointing this out. I'll try to be clearer next time.

	Danny
-- 
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info