From: Danny Backx <danny.backx@scarlet.be>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Patch : gdbserver get_image_name on CE
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244397699.11918.216.camel@pavilion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906071804.37208.pedro@codesourcery.com>
I can't give a full answer yet.
The code that I sent a patch for today didn't work. It reported a DLL
name "co" which should have been "coredll.dll". I suspect that the
result of ReadProcessMemory isn't always what it should be, causing the
loop to end too early. (This function also reports success via its last
parameter. Looks like that's more reliable.)
The next thing I'll do is figure out why the "bt" command isn't working.
Have no clue why. Will report when I do :-)
Feel free to ignore these patches until they're complete, if that is a
better idea. I sent this one separately because it looked contained.
Danny
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 18:04 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Sunday 07 June 2009 10:18:17, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > gdbserver doesn't work well yet on WinCE on x86. I'll send more fixes
> > when they are ready.
> >
> > This one fixes obtaining the names of DLLs loaded by the inferior. The
> > patched code also still works on WinCE on ARM.
>
> Could you please explain what is different here on x86 CE vs ARM CE
> vs x86 desktop Windows? Is x86 CE != ARM CE *and* != x86 desktop?
>
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-07 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-07 9:18 Danny Backx
2009-06-07 17:03 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-07 18:02 ` Danny Backx [this message]
2009-06-07 18:15 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-07 19:13 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-07 19:28 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-08 18:13 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-12 22:18 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-13 6:28 ` Johnny Willemsen
2009-06-13 14:29 Danny Backx
2009-06-13 18:05 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-13 18:08 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14 8:35 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 13:56 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14 8:47 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 9:48 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 14:23 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-21 9:50 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-30 21:07 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-30 21:56 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-01 18:41 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 18:52 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-01 19:12 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 20:12 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-04 18:14 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-08 9:55 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-08 11:34 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-27 20:40 ` Danny Backx
2009-07-01 19:31 ` Danny Backx
2009-06-14 14:34 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-14 14:05 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244397699.11918.216.camel@pavilion \
--to=danny.backx@scarlet.be \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox