Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>,
		sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- Architecture-independent 	part
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081104223421.GC5391@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uvdv3t9ny.fsf@gnu.org>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:21:05AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > ... but from what you are saying it seems that in Windows it's
> > different. What's the proper datatype to represent a syscall there?
> 
> A symbol, I think.

As far as I can tell, Windows has system calls just like other OS's
do; as of Windows NT they were triggered by "int 2e" and the syscall
number went in %eax.

There's plenty of other levels of potential traceability in a Windows
program than the system call, but I think that's the obvious one to
map "catch syscall" on to.  Although, I don't believe GDB will be able
to catch Windows syscalls; I don't see a way to do it, anyway, but
there's plenty I don't know about Windows.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-04 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-04  4:32 Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-04 16:17 ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-07  3:30   ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-07 12:12     ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-07 13:30       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-08 15:35       ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-04 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-04 21:55   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-11-04 22:33     ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-05 19:05       ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-05 19:13         ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-07  3:41         ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-07  3:39   ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-07 18:21     ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-04 21:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-04 22:12   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-11-04 22:22     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-04 22:35       ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-11-05  4:19         ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 13:34           ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-05 18:42             ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-08 19:31             ` Mark Kettenis
2008-11-05 14:55           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-05 18:43             ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 18:59               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-05 19:11                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-06 23:03               ` Mark Kettenis
2008-11-04 22:31     ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05  4:10       ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 12:29         ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05 18:38           ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 18:57             ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05 19:10               ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 19:34                 ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05 20:36                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 21:10                     ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-06  4:27                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-06 14:32                         ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-07  9:59                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-07 10:10                             ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05 13:32         ` Mark Kettenis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-30 18:12 Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-02 21:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-03  2:33   ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-03  6:07     ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-03 17:52       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-04 23:07         ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-04 23:04       ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-06 17:22         ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-10 13:12           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-10 15:28           ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-12  2:26           ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-15  5:40             ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-16  3:35               ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-16 12:37                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-16 15:17                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-16 16:28                     ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081104223421.GC5391@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox