Re: [PATCH 1/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- Architecture-independent part

["Sérgio Durigan Júnior" <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Hi Joel,

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 22:40 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> So, Sergio, here is what I'm proposing: If you are in a hurry, then
> can you investigate the reason for the regressions? It shouldn't be
> too difficult.  Once fixed and approved, you can then start building
> your patch on top of mine.  If you're not in a hurry, then I'll pick
> it up again when I have some free time again.

Thanks a lot for your patch! I know you must be totally busy now, so
thanks again for taking your time to do this.

Well, I took your patch and ran the testsuite here for both PPC and
PPC64 archs. Things seem to be OK! I wasn't able to reproduce this
regression you told; (I don't think so, but just in case...) maybe it's
an x86 issue? Or maybe this particular test is non-deterministic?

Anyway, if you (or anybody) could give me more pointers to this I'd
appreciate :-).

Regards,

-- 
Sérgio Durigan Júnior
Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - LTC
IBM Brazil