Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sérgio Durigan Júnior" <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
	bauerman@br.ibm.com,         gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- 	Architecture-independent	part
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225892021.32321.58.camel@miki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ur65qu7ov.fsf@gnu.org>

On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 06:18 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> I'd like us very much to have some higher-level abstraction of a
> syscall in target-independent code, than just a number.  Can we do
> that, please?

I'm sorry about my bad design assumptions, but that just sounded good
for me by the time I was developing. I think we can do the higher-level
abstraction that you are asking, but I'd like you to please describe in
more details how this abstraction would be, or even better, if that's
not asking too much you could take the code I did and implement
something better :-).

I'm sorry about these assumptions I've made, again.

Regards,

-- 
Sérgio Durigan Júnior
Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - LTC
IBM Brazil


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-05 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-04  4:32 Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-04 16:17 ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-07  3:30   ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-07 12:12     ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-07 13:30       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-08 15:35       ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-04 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-04 21:55   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-11-04 22:33     ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-05 19:05       ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-05 19:13         ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-07  3:41         ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-07  3:39   ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-11-07 18:21     ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-04 21:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-04 22:12   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-11-04 22:22     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-04 22:35       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-05  4:19         ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 13:34           ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior [this message]
2008-11-05 18:42             ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-08 19:31             ` Mark Kettenis
2008-11-05 14:55           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-05 18:43             ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 18:59               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-11-05 19:11                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-06 23:03               ` Mark Kettenis
2008-11-04 22:31     ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05  4:10       ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 12:29         ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05 18:38           ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 18:57             ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05 19:10               ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 19:34                 ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05 20:36                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-05 21:10                     ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-06  4:27                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-06 14:32                         ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-07  9:59                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-07 10:10                             ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-05 13:32         ` Mark Kettenis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-30 18:12 Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-02 21:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-03  2:33   ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-03  6:07     ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-03 17:52       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-04 23:07         ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-04 23:04       ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-06 17:22         ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-10 13:12           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-10 15:28           ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-12  2:26           ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-15  5:40             ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-16  3:35               ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-10-16 12:37                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-16 15:17                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-10-16 16:28                     ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1225892021.32321.58.camel@miki \
    --to=sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox