Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFA] Fix problem fetching/setting FSR register (IRIX)
@ 2005-03-26  0:43 Joel Brobecker
  2005-03-26  8:02 ` Mark Kettenis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2005-03-26  0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 759 bytes --]

Hello,

The attached patch fixes the problem reported at:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-03/msg00294.html

The explaination of the actual problem is detailed at:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-03/msg00309.html

I have also added some comments in the code, and included Mark's
comments.

2005-03-25  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>

        * irix5-nat.c (supply_fpregset): Fix bug that caused the FSR
        register value to be incorrectly written in the regcache.
        (fill_fpregset): Fix bug that caused the FSR register value
        to be incorrectly read from the regcache.
        Fixes [E223-028].

Tested on mips-irix. No regression. OK to apply?

(I will submit a testcase for this asap)

Thanks,
-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: irix5-nat.c.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2310 bytes --]

Index: irix5-nat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/irix5-nat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -p -r1.38 irix5-nat.c
--- irix5-nat.c	11 Feb 2005 04:05:56 -0000	1.38
+++ irix5-nat.c	26 Mar 2005 00:37:49 -0000
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ supply_fpregset (fpregset_t *fpregsetp)
 {
   int regi;
   static char zerobuf[32] = {0};
+  char fsrbuf[8];
 
   /* FIXME, this is wrong for the N32 ABI which has 64 bit FP regs. */
 
@@ -146,9 +147,17 @@ supply_fpregset (fpregset_t *fpregsetp)
     regcache_raw_supply (current_regcache, FP0_REGNUM + regi,
 			 (char *) &fpregsetp->fp_r.fp_regs[regi]);
 
+  /* We can't supply the FSR register directly to the regcache,
+     because there is a size issue: On one hand, fpregsetp->fp_csr
+     is 32bits long, while the regcache expects a 64bits long value.
+     So we use a buffer of the correct size and copy into it the register
+     value at the proper location.  */
+  memset (fsrbuf, 0, 4);
+  memcpy (fsrbuf + 4, &fpregsetp->fp_csr, 4);
+
   regcache_raw_supply (current_regcache,
 		       mips_regnum (current_gdbarch)->fp_control_status,
-		       (char *) &fpregsetp->fp_csr);
+		       fsrbuf);
 
   /* FIXME: how can we supply FCRIR?  SGI doesn't tell us. */
   regcache_raw_supply (current_regcache,
@@ -173,11 +182,22 @@ fill_fpregset (fpregset_t *fpregsetp, in
 	}
     }
 
-  if ((regno == -1)
-      || (regno == mips_regnum (current_gdbarch)->fp_control_status))
-    regcache_raw_read (current_regcache,
-                       mips_regnum (current_gdbarch)->fp_control_status, 
-                       &fpregsetp->fp_csr);
+  if (regno == -1
+      || regno == mips_regnum (current_gdbarch)->fp_control_status)
+    {
+      char fsrbuf[8];
+
+      /* We can't fill the FSR register directly from the regcache,
+         because there is a size issue: On one hand, fpregsetp->fp_csr
+         is 32bits long, while the regcache expects a 64bits long buffer.
+         So we use a buffer of the correct size and copy the register
+         value from that buffer.  */
+      regcache_raw_read (current_regcache,
+                         mips_regnum (current_gdbarch)->fp_control_status,
+                         fsrbuf);
+
+      memcpy (&fpregsetp->fp_csr, fsrbuf + 4, 4);
+    }
 }
 
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Fix problem fetching/setting FSR register (IRIX)
  2005-03-26  0:43 [RFA] Fix problem fetching/setting FSR register (IRIX) Joel Brobecker
@ 2005-03-26  8:02 ` Mark Kettenis
  2005-03-28 22:34   ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2005-03-26  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches

   Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:43:08 -0800
   From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>

   Hello,

   The attached patch fixes the problem reported at:
   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-03/msg00294.html

   The explaination of the actual problem is detailed at:
   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-03/msg00309.html

   I have also added some comments in the code, and included Mark's
   comments.

   2005-03-25  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>

	   * irix5-nat.c (supply_fpregset): Fix bug that caused the FSR
	   register value to be incorrectly written in the regcache.
	   (fill_fpregset): Fix bug that caused the FSR register value
	   to be incorrectly read from the regcache.
	   Fixes [E223-028].

   Tested on mips-irix. No regression. OK to apply?

Oh, my message was sort of intended as approval.  But now that you
asked again, there's one little nit: what's that funny E223-028.  If
it is what I think it is, then I'm not sure if we should add bug ID's
from a non-public bug database to our ChangeLog.

   (I will submit a testcase for this asap)

A somewhat general MIPS floating-point test would be great ;-).

Mark


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] Fix problem fetching/setting FSR register (IRIX)
  2005-03-26  8:02 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2005-03-28 22:34   ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2005-03-28 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: gdb-patches

>    2005-03-25  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> 	   * irix5-nat.c (supply_fpregset): Fix bug that caused the FSR
> 	   register value to be incorrectly written in the regcache.
> 	   (fill_fpregset): Fix bug that caused the FSR register value
> 	   to be incorrectly read from the regcache.
> 	   Fixes [E223-028].
> 
>    Tested on mips-irix. No regression. OK to apply?
> 
> Oh, my message was sort of intended as approval.  But now that you
> asked again, there's one little nit: what's that funny E223-028.  If
> it is what I think it is, then I'm not sure if we should add bug ID's
> from a non-public bug database to our ChangeLog.

Oops. Thanks for catching this. It was a copy/paste error on my part.
I made sure I didn't included it in the ChangeLog.

>    (I will submit a testcase for this asap)
> 
> A somewhat general MIPS floating-point test would be great ;-).

Hmmm, the problem is that I am not very good with floats...
I'll see what I can do.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-28 22:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-26  0:43 [RFA] Fix problem fetching/setting FSR register (IRIX) Joel Brobecker
2005-03-26  8:02 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-03-28 22:34   ` Joel Brobecker

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox