Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: randolph@tausq.org
Cc: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411231933.iANJXHtx013950@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041123174937.GL9148@tausq.org> (message from Randolph Chung on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:49:37 -0800)

   Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:49:37 -0800
   From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>

   i did some more investigations.... turns out this is not a cosmetic
   piece of code at all :)

   suppose we have a function that ended with a branch-with-nullify-next
   instruction back to the caller. if you did a "step" on the branch, and
   we don't skip the nullified instruction, we would end up on the
   nullified instruction which actually belongs to the next function.

   comments? ok to check in?

OK, if you make sure you wrap the lines that are too long.

Mark

   2004-11-23  Randolph Chung  <tausq@debian.org>

	   * arch-utils.c (generic_instruction_nullified): New.
	   * arch-utils.h (generic_instruction_nullified): New.
	   * gdbarch.sh (instruction_nullified): New method.
	   * gdbarch.c: Regenerate.
	   * gdbarch.h: Regenerate.
	   * infrun.c (INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED): Delete.
	   (handle_inferior_event): Replace INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED with calls to
	   new gdbarch method.
	   * config/pa/tm-hppa.h (INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED): Delete definition.
	   * hppa-tdep.c (hppa_instruction_nullified): Remove prototype and make
	   static.  Rewrite to work directly off the passed regcache.
	   (hppa_gdbarch_init): Set instruction_nullified method.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-23 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-18  0:02 Randolph Chung
2004-11-18 14:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 16:21   ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-18 16:56     ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-19  9:25       ` Orjan Friberg
2004-11-23 17:50       ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-23 19:33         ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-11-28 17:26         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-28 18:41           ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-28 19:55             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-29  3:30               ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-29 15:12                 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30  6:56                   ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-30 14:51                     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 16:44                       ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-30 16:59                         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 17:38                           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 21:29                             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-01 22:33                               ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 23:32                                 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-02  5:24                                   ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-02 14:27                                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-03 18:11                                     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 18:15                                       ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 18:57                                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-03 19:57                                           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 21:40                                       ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 21:58                                         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 22:52                                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-04  0:00                                           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-04  0:55                                           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 11:27                                             ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-01  6:19                   ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:11                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:17                       ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:19                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:25                           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:28                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:30                               ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:35                               ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 18:14                                 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 21:25                       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-01 13:32 Paul Schlie
2004-12-01 16:25 Randolph Chung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200411231933.iANJXHtx013950@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=randolph@tausq.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox