From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041203185656.GA9320@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041203181505.GF6359@tausq.org>
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 10:15:05AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > Anyway, more relevant, and as daniel asked, can it be done in assember?
> > A starting point for that might be the gdb.asm test case which uses
> > assembly source code.
>
> i'm working on it, but getting stuck with a weird problem... i'm seeing
> a case where i do:
>
> proc get_addr_of_sym { sym } {
> set addr 0
> global gdb_prompt
> global expect_out
Not sure but I don't think you need to declare expect_out as a global.
> send_gdb "print $sym\n"
> gdb_expect 60 {
> -re ".*($hex) <$sym>.*$gdb_prompt $" {
> set addr $expect_out(1,string)
> pass "got address of $sym = $addr"
> }
> timeout {
> fail "cannot get address of $sym (timed out)."
> gdb_suppress_tests
> }
> }
>
> return $addr
> }
>
> set foo [get_addr_of_sym "foo"]
> set bar [get_addr_of_sym "bar"]
>
> i always get a FAIL on that, and from looking at the log (with --debug)
> it seems like the gdb_expect is returning immediately without checking
> for results from the previous send_gdb command....
>
> viz:
> send: sending "print foo\n" to { exp11 }^M
> FAIL: gdb.arch/pa-nullify.exp: cannot get address of foo (timed out).
> send: sending "print bar\n" to { exp11 }^M
> FAIL: gdb.arch/pa-nullify.exp: cannot get address of bar (timed out).
>
> am i doing something obviously wrong?
First, as Andrew mentioned, don't use gdb_expect this way. Use
gdb_test_multiple.
Secondly, there are two possible causes of this. One is a syntax
error, in either the regular expression or the code for the matching
case. That will invoke the "timeout" handler. The other is that you've
gotten out of sync somehow; doesn't look too likely from the above.
Try putting "exp_internal 1" in front of it to see what expect thinks
it is doing.
I just saw the bug: try "global hex" and see if that helps.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-03 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-18 0:02 Randolph Chung
2004-11-18 14:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 16:21 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-18 16:56 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-19 9:25 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-11-23 17:50 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-23 19:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-28 17:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-28 18:41 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-28 19:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-29 3:30 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-29 15:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 6:56 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-30 14:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 16:44 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-30 16:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 17:38 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 21:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-01 22:33 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 23:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-02 5:24 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-02 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-03 18:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 18:15 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 18:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-12-03 19:57 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 21:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 21:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 22:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-04 0:00 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 0:55 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 11:27 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-01 6:19 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:17 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:25 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:30 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:35 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 18:14 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 21:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-01 13:32 Paul Schlie
2004-12-01 16:25 Randolph Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041203185656.GA9320@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox