From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041130164401.GV6359@tausq.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41AC88B2.5070501@gnu.org>
In reference to a message from Andrew Cagney, dated Nov 30:
> Randolph Chung wrote:
> >>If you want, add a DEPRECATED_INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED to the architecture
> >>vector and have the PA-RISC use that. While a sideways step, it lets
> >>you advance what I'm assuming is the more immediate objective of
> >>cleaning out PA's tm*.h files and making it pure multi-arch.
> >
> >
> >well, based on Mark's earlier ok i had checked in the
> >instruction_nullified stuff already. since this doesn't seem to be ok,
> >let me try to fix this properly and see what happens.
>
> I don't know why Mark did that, this one is certainly ``tricky'' :-)
> Just rename it.
well, first i want to understand the problem. because i'm still not
yet 100% convinced that step_through_delay will work. simply using the
"instruction_nullified" method in hppa-tdep as the "step_through_delay"
method certainly is not working...
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-30 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-18 0:02 Randolph Chung
2004-11-18 14:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 16:21 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-18 16:56 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-19 9:25 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-11-23 17:50 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-23 19:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-28 17:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-28 18:41 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-28 19:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-29 3:30 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-29 15:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 6:56 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-30 14:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 16:44 ` Randolph Chung [this message]
2004-11-30 16:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 17:38 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 21:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-01 22:33 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 23:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-02 5:24 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-02 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-03 18:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 18:15 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 18:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-03 19:57 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 21:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 21:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 22:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-04 0:00 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 0:55 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 11:27 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-01 6:19 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:17 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:25 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:30 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:35 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 18:14 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 21:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-01 13:32 Paul Schlie
2004-12-01 16:25 Randolph Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041130164401.GV6359@tausq.org \
--to=randolph@tausq.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox