From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041128184141.GG6359@tausq.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41AA09F8.4020006@gnu.org>
> Is it possible to create a core file with the PC sitting on the
> nullified instruction, and if such a beast is created, how can GDB
> correctly handle it - GDB clearly can't single step the core file. If
> that problem is solved, this method becomes redundant.
what do you mean? this fix is in the handling of inferior events, so
it doesn't apply to core files anyway, right? what case with core files
do you think needs to be correctly handled?
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-28 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-18 0:02 Randolph Chung
2004-11-18 14:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-18 16:21 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-18 16:56 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-19 9:25 ` Orjan Friberg
2004-11-23 17:50 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-23 19:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-28 17:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-28 18:41 ` Randolph Chung [this message]
2004-11-28 19:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-29 3:30 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-29 15:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 6:56 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-30 14:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 16:44 ` Randolph Chung
2004-11-30 16:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-30 17:38 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 21:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-01 22:33 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 23:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-02 5:24 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-02 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-03 18:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 18:15 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 18:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-03 19:57 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 21:40 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 21:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 22:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-04 0:00 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 0:55 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 11:27 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-01 6:19 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:17 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:25 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-01 17:30 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 17:35 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 18:14 ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-01 21:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-01 13:32 Paul Schlie
2004-12-01 16:25 Randolph Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041128184141.GG6359@tausq.org \
--to=randolph@tausq.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox