* gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit
@ 2003-09-25 23:41 David Carlton
2003-09-25 23:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Carlton @ 2003-09-25 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Andrew Cagney
I noticed that, in the transition from gdb.cp/annota2.exp to
gdb.cp/annota3.exp, the KFAIL for annotate-quit got removed; am I
correct in assuming that this is just an oversight? It still
consistently fails for me (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.1, DWARF 2).
Also, given the existence of gdb.base/annota3.exp, should that test be
moved there? It doesn't look C++-specific.
(I wasn't aware of the existence of gdb_expect_list; it certainly
improves readability.)
David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit
2003-09-25 23:41 gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit David Carlton
@ 2003-09-25 23:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-26 0:01 ` David Carlton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-09-25 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Carlton; +Cc: gdb-patches, Andrew Cagney
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:41:50PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> I noticed that, in the transition from gdb.cp/annota2.exp to
> gdb.cp/annota3.exp, the KFAIL for annotate-quit got removed; am I
> correct in assuming that this is just an oversight? It still
> consistently fails for me (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.1, DWARF 2).
It doesn't fail here. I'd really really like to find out what the
difference is.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit
2003-09-25 23:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2003-09-26 0:01 ` David Carlton
2003-09-26 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Carlton @ 2003-09-26 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Andrew Cagney
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:53:00 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:41:50PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
>> I noticed that, in the transition from gdb.cp/annota2.exp to
>> gdb.cp/annota3.exp, the KFAIL for annotate-quit got removed; am I
>> correct in assuming that this is just an oversight? It still
>> consistently fails for me (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.1, DWARF 2).
> It doesn't fail here. I'd really really like to find out what the
> difference is.
Interesting. I assume the corresponding test in annota2.exp passes
for you as well?
David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit
2003-09-26 0:01 ` David Carlton
@ 2003-09-26 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-09-26 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 05:01:36PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:53:00 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:41:50PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
>
> >> I noticed that, in the transition from gdb.cp/annota2.exp to
> >> gdb.cp/annota3.exp, the KFAIL for annotate-quit got removed; am I
> >> correct in assuming that this is just an oversight? It still
> >> consistently fails for me (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.1, DWARF 2).
>
> > It doesn't fail here. I'd really really like to find out what the
> > difference is.
>
> Interesting. I assume the corresponding test in annota2.exp passes
> for you as well?
Yes, it does.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-26 14:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-25 23:41 gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit David Carlton
2003-09-25 23:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-26 0:01 ` David Carlton
2003-09-26 14:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox