From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27016 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2003 00:01:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27001 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 00:01:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 00:01:37 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id A305ECB31; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:01:36 -0700 (PDT) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit References: <20030925235300.GA22524@nevyn.them.org> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030925235300.GA22524@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:53:00 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:53:00 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:41:50PM -0700, David Carlton wrote: >> I noticed that, in the transition from gdb.cp/annota2.exp to >> gdb.cp/annota3.exp, the KFAIL for annotate-quit got removed; am I >> correct in assuming that this is just an oversight? It still >> consistently fails for me (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.1, DWARF 2). > It doesn't fail here. I'd really really like to find out what the > difference is. Interesting. I assume the corresponding test in annota2.exp passes for you as well? David Carlton carlton@kealia.com