From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16458 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2003 23:41:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16450 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 23:41:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2003 23:41:50 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 2A5C5CB31; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:41:50 -0700 (PDT) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: Andrew Cagney Subject: gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 23:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00581.txt.bz2 I noticed that, in the transition from gdb.cp/annota2.exp to gdb.cp/annota3.exp, the KFAIL for annotate-quit got removed; am I correct in assuming that this is just an oversight? It still consistently fails for me (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.1, DWARF 2). Also, given the existence of gdb.base/annota3.exp, should that test be moved there? It doesn't look C++-specific. (I wasn't aware of the existence of gdb_expect_list; it certainly improves readability.) David Carlton carlton@kealia.com