From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27738 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2003 14:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27731 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 14:00:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 14:00:59 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1A2t9W-0000L9-S7 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:00:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit Message-ID: <20030926140058.GA1269@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030925235300.GA22524@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00592.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 05:01:36PM -0700, David Carlton wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:53:00 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:41:50PM -0700, David Carlton wrote: > > >> I noticed that, in the transition from gdb.cp/annota2.exp to > >> gdb.cp/annota3.exp, the KFAIL for annotate-quit got removed; am I > >> correct in assuming that this is just an oversight? It still > >> consistently fails for me (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GCC 3.1, DWARF 2). > > > It doesn't fail here. I'd really really like to find out what the > > difference is. > > Interesting. I assume the corresponding test in annota2.exp passes > for you as well? Yes, it does. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer