* [RFA/5.3] Fix a compilation warning in hppa-tdep.c
@ 2002-10-30 15:20 Joel Brobecker
2002-10-31 11:26 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2002-10-30 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 405 bytes --]
I am not sure we want to pull this change in the 5.3 branch, as it does
not fix any regression. It's the change I checked in the trunk to fix a
compilation warning - the same warning appears in the 5.3 branch, so I
though I'd suggest it there too.
2002-10-30 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
* hppa-tdep.c (low_text_segment_addres): Fix a compilation warning.
Should I apply it?
--
Joel
[-- Attachment #2: hppa-tdep.c.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 985 bytes --]
Index: hppa-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/hppa-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -c -3 -p -r1.27 hppa-tdep.c
*** hppa-tdep.c 5 May 2002 01:15:13 -0000 1.27
--- hppa-tdep.c 30 Oct 2002 23:10:55 -0000
*************** static CORE_ADDR low_text_segment_addres
*** 300,306 ****
static void
record_text_segment_lowaddr (bfd *abfd, asection *section, void *ignored)
{
! if ((section->flags & (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY)
== (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
&& section->vma < low_text_segment_address)
low_text_segment_address = section->vma;
--- 300,306 ----
static void
record_text_segment_lowaddr (bfd *abfd, asection *section, void *ignored)
{
! if (((section->flags & (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
== (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
&& section->vma < low_text_segment_address)
low_text_segment_address = section->vma;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/5.3] Fix a compilation warning in hppa-tdep.c
2002-10-30 15:20 [RFA/5.3] Fix a compilation warning in hppa-tdep.c Joel Brobecker
@ 2002-10-31 11:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-31 15:39 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-10-31 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
> I am not sure we want to pull this change in the 5.3 branch, as it does
> not fix any regression. It's the change I checked in the trunk to fix a
> compilation warning - the same warning appears in the 5.3 branch, so I
> though I'd suggest it there too.
>
> 2002-10-30 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
>
> * hppa-tdep.c (low_text_segment_addres): Fix a compilation warning.
>
> Should I apply it?
I say `Yes', and the same for any other HP changes you feel should be
pulled in from the mainline.
Just keep an eye out for my long over due e-mail indicating `stop, no
more 5.3 changes' :-/
> Index: hppa-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/hppa-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.27
> diff -c -3 -p -r1.27 hppa-tdep.c
> *** hppa-tdep.c 5 May 2002 01:15:13 -0000 1.27
> --- hppa-tdep.c 30 Oct 2002 23:10:55 -0000
> *************** static CORE_ADDR low_text_segment_addres
> *** 300,306 ****
> static void
> record_text_segment_lowaddr (bfd *abfd, asection *section, void *ignored)
> {
> ! if ((section->flags & (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY)
> == (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
> && section->vma < low_text_segment_address)
> low_text_segment_address = section->vma;
> --- 300,306 ----
> static void
> record_text_segment_lowaddr (bfd *abfd, asection *section, void *ignored)
> {
> ! if (((section->flags & (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
> == (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
> && section->vma < low_text_segment_address)
> low_text_segment_address = section->vma;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/5.3] Fix a compilation warning in hppa-tdep.c
2002-10-31 11:26 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-10-31 15:39 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2002-10-31 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
> >2002-10-30 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
> >
> > * hppa-tdep.c (low_text_segment_addres): Fix a compilation warning.
> >
> >Should I apply it?
>
> I say `Yes', and the same for any other HP changes you feel should be
> pulled in from the mainline.
Ok, thanks for the rule of thumb.
This change is now checked in.
> Just keep an eye out for my long over due e-mail indicating `stop, no
> more 5.3 changes' :-/
Wildo.
BTW: I am in the middle of recompiling and testing the 5.3 sources on
most targets supported by ACT. Will report the results (HP is fine).
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-31 23:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-30 15:20 [RFA/5.3] Fix a compilation warning in hppa-tdep.c Joel Brobecker
2002-10-31 11:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-31 15:39 ` Joel Brobecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox