From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2063 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2002 23:39:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2033 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2002 23:39:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2002 23:39:45 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 53CB5D2CC7; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:41:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/5.3] Fix a compilation warning in hppa-tdep.c Message-ID: <20021031234138.GY903@gnat.com> References: <20021030232154.GP903@gnat.com> <3DC183F2.5080304@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DC183F2.5080304@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00614.txt.bz2 > >2002-10-30 Joel Brobecker > > > > * hppa-tdep.c (low_text_segment_addres): Fix a compilation warning. > > > >Should I apply it? > > I say `Yes', and the same for any other HP changes you feel should be > pulled in from the mainline. Ok, thanks for the rule of thumb. This change is now checked in. > Just keep an eye out for my long over due e-mail indicating `stop, no > more 5.3 changes' :-/ Wildo. BTW: I am in the middle of recompiling and testing the 5.3 sources on most targets supported by ACT. Will report the results (HP is fine). -- Joel