Re: [RFA/5.3] Fix a compilation warning in hppa-tdep.c

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

> I am not sure we want to pull this change in the 5.3 branch, as it does
> not fix any regression. It's the change I checked in the trunk to fix a
> compilation warning - the same warning appears in the 5.3 branch, so I
> though I'd suggest it there too.
> 
> 2002-10-30  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@gnat.com>
> 
>         * hppa-tdep.c (low_text_segment_addres): Fix a compilation warning.
> 
> Should I apply it?

I say `Yes', and the same for any other HP changes you feel should be 
pulled in from the mainline.

Just keep an eye out for my long over due e-mail indicating `stop, no 
more 5.3 changes' :-/

> Index: hppa-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/hppa-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.27
> diff -c -3 -p -r1.27 hppa-tdep.c
> *** hppa-tdep.c	5 May 2002 01:15:13 -0000	1.27
> --- hppa-tdep.c	30 Oct 2002 23:10:55 -0000
> *************** static CORE_ADDR low_text_segment_addres
> *** 300,306 ****
>   static void
>   record_text_segment_lowaddr (bfd *abfd, asection *section, void *ignored)
>   {
> !   if ((section->flags & (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY)
>          == (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
>         && section->vma < low_text_segment_address)
>       low_text_segment_address = section->vma;
> --- 300,306 ----
>   static void
>   record_text_segment_lowaddr (bfd *abfd, asection *section, void *ignored)
>   {
> !   if (((section->flags & (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
>          == (SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_READONLY))
>         && section->vma < low_text_segment_address)
>       low_text_segment_address = section->vma;