Re: Outstanding?

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

Quite a list, let's see how I can help.

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:16:19PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> RFA: abstract out thread compilation code

Pretty sure that one's resolved.

> RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too
> RFA: don't use minsym name when searching block
> RFA: test C++ casts
> RFC: CLI clenup and edit command

Definitely not sure, but I thought these were also?

> RFC: ``detach remote''

Yeah, I owe an MI test case for this.  I'll do it today if I can.

> Remote protocol extension - detaching

This was part of the above, right?  If so, I think it's covered.

> Review of DW_TAG_module and DWARF multiple comp unit header support 

... please.

> THUMB_FP vs. ARM_FP
> THUMB_FP vs. ARM_FP 

Duplicate.  Don't know its status, though.

> TYPE_VPTR_BASETYPE and TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE

I think this is done.

> [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] Re: [RFA] dwarf2read.c:
> [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] Re: [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods
> [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] [RFA] DWARF-2, static data members
> [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods
> [Fwd: RFA: abstract out thread compilation code]
> [Fwd: superfluous line in hpread.c]
> [Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>] RFA: abstract out thread compilation code
> [Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>] RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too
> [Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>] Re: RFA: test GDB's ability to

I _think_ these all went in.

> [PATCH RFC] Character set support

Done.

> [PATCH/RFA] Add new readline.exp test for operate-and-get-next

Done.

> [RFA/MI testsuite] Add pthreads tests

Done now I think.

> [RFA/controversial] move bp by line number past the prologue

Definitely still pending.

> [RFA] 2nd send: Solve the watchpoint failures on second run.

I think this went in 5.2.1 and trunk.

> [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods

Done as above...

> [patch/5.3, rfa:testsuite] Fix $fp and $pc in display command

Didn't you commit that?

> [patch] Fix to processing end of function stab in dbxread.c

I think this patch should go in...

> [rfa/testsuite] more tests in gdb.c++/m-static

Think this did.

> [rfa] Symbol hashing (for the last time?)

Wow, this is old.  Yes, this went in.

> adding namespace support to GDB

Well, the issue is still outstanding, but I don't know what message
this is.  I would know if our mailing lists were searchable by
something besides ht://Dig...

> gdb vs readline, 1line patch

Went in.

> references to uninitialized static const members

Went in, I think.

> superfluous line in hpread.c

Went in.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer