From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Outstanding?
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2adm3avoy.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D93CD83.5020704@redhat.com>
The following patches have been committed:
> RFA: abstract out thread compilation code
> [Fwd: RFA: abstract out thread compilation code]
> [Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>] RFA: abstract out thread compilation code
> RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too
> [Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>] RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too
> RFA: don't use minsym name when searching block
> [Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>] Re: RFA: test GDB's ability to
> [PATCH RFC] Character set support
> dwarf2_build_psymtabs should check that .debug_line exists
The following are still awaiting approval:
> RFA: respect `nosignals' setting in annota1.exp
> [Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>] RFA: respect `nosignals' setting in annota1.exp
> RFA: test C++ casts
> [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods
For the below, we're waiting for papers for the fellow who modified
the patch:
> Review of DW_TAG_module and DWARF multiple comp unit header support
> [RFA] DWARF multiple comp unit header support - Revision - Part
> [RFA] DWARF multiple comp unit header support - Revision - Part 1
This one has been rejected --- well, put off until we know what effect
it has on mdebug.
> [RFA] delete BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT
These are being handled on a branch; they're not RFA's:
> [RFA] convert blocks to dictionaries, phase 1, main part
> [RFA] convert blocks to dictionaries, phase 1, mdebugread.c
> [RFC] environment.c
This is awaiting further discussion; it would be good to have it in
the bug database.
> [patch] Fix to processing end of function stab in dbxread.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-27 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-26 20:16 Outstanding? Andrew Cagney
2002-09-27 7:24 ` Outstanding? Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-27 9:26 ` Outstanding? Andrew Cagney
2002-09-27 9:40 ` Outstanding? David Carlton
2002-09-27 10:56 ` Outstanding? Andrew Cagney
2002-09-27 16:11 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-09-27 16:22 ` Outstanding? David Carlton
2002-10-01 15:22 ` Outstanding? Michael Snyder
2002-10-01 16:20 ` Outstanding? Andrew Cagney
2002-10-01 17:38 ` Outstanding? Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-01 18:11 ` Outstanding? Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt2adm3avoy.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox