Re: Outstanding?

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>]

> Patch that provides true single step for multi-threaded /proc based

The guy who submitted the above has never responded to email since then.
It's missing a changelog entry.  Should I just write one and check it in?


> RFA (threads testsuite): More thread tests

This has been checked in.

> RFA: abstract out thread compilation code

So has this.

> Race condition in sol-thread.c

This one was rejected.


> TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT in target vector

> THUMB_FP vs. ARM_FP

Checked in.

> [Fwd: [RFA] Patch to correct problem with 'detach' on Tru64]

Checked in.


> [PATCH] Minor reformatting in infrun.c

Checked in.

> [RFA/controversial] move bp by line number past the prologue

Didn't achieve consensus, as I recall...

> [RFA] 2nd send: Solve the watchpoint failures on second run.

Rats.  This one escaped.  Jim or I should look at it.

> [RFA] Change to parse error reporting

This one was committed, and so noted on the list.

> [RFA] Don't coerce arrays if they're vectors.

Outstanding.

> [RFA] Fix watchpoints when stepping over a breakpoint

The last msg in this thread was yours.

> [RFA] GDB/622 - clear current breakpoint in commands causes trouble
> [RFA] GDB/624 - tbreak commands not executed when breakpoint hit

Committed.

> [RFA] Patch to correct problem with 'detach' on Tru64

Committed.

> [RFA] deleting breakpoints inside of 'commands'

Handled on a different thread, closed.

> [RFA] enable software single step on alpha-osf

Committed.

> [RFA] generic_dummy glitch in arm-tdep.c

Committed.