From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31954 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2002 22:22:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31935 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2002 22:22:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2002 22:22:28 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g91M3hi11914 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:03:43 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g91MMQl02612; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:22:27 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-149.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.149]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g91MMQw05025; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:22:26 -0700 Message-ID: <3D9A1FEE.A8BE31F7@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 15:22:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Outstanding? References: <3D93CD83.5020704@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 > Patch that provides true single step for multi-threaded /proc based The guy who submitted the above has never responded to email since then. It's missing a changelog entry. Should I just write one and check it in? > RFA (threads testsuite): More thread tests This has been checked in. > RFA: abstract out thread compilation code So has this. > Race condition in sol-thread.c This one was rejected. > TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT in target vector > THUMB_FP vs. ARM_FP Checked in. > [Fwd: [RFA] Patch to correct problem with 'detach' on Tru64] Checked in. > [PATCH] Minor reformatting in infrun.c Checked in. > [RFA/controversial] move bp by line number past the prologue Didn't achieve consensus, as I recall... > [RFA] 2nd send: Solve the watchpoint failures on second run. Rats. This one escaped. Jim or I should look at it. > [RFA] Change to parse error reporting This one was committed, and so noted on the list. > [RFA] Don't coerce arrays if they're vectors. Outstanding. > [RFA] Fix watchpoints when stepping over a breakpoint The last msg in this thread was yours. > [RFA] GDB/622 - clear current breakpoint in commands causes trouble > [RFA] GDB/624 - tbreak commands not executed when breakpoint hit Committed. > [RFA] Patch to correct problem with 'detach' on Tru64 Committed. > [RFA] deleting breakpoints inside of 'commands' Handled on a different thread, closed. > [RFA] enable software single step on alpha-osf Committed. > [RFA] generic_dummy glitch in arm-tdep.c Committed.