From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21314 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 14:24:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21277 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 14:24:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 14:24:46 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17uwys-0008O1-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:24:38 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17uw3C-0001ic-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:25:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Outstanding? Message-ID: <20020927142501.GA5939@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3D93CD83.5020704@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D93CD83.5020704@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00663.txt.bz2 Quite a list, let's see how I can help. On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:16:19PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > RFA: abstract out thread compilation code Pretty sure that one's resolved. > RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too > RFA: don't use minsym name when searching block > RFA: test C++ casts > RFC: CLI clenup and edit command Definitely not sure, but I thought these were also? > RFC: ``detach remote'' Yeah, I owe an MI test case for this. I'll do it today if I can. > Remote protocol extension - detaching This was part of the above, right? If so, I think it's covered. > Review of DW_TAG_module and DWARF multiple comp unit header support ... please. > THUMB_FP vs. ARM_FP > THUMB_FP vs. ARM_FP Duplicate. Don't know its status, though. > TYPE_VPTR_BASETYPE and TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE I think this is done. > [David Carlton ] Re: [RFA] dwarf2read.c: > [David Carlton ] Re: [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods > [David Carlton ] [RFA] DWARF-2, static data members > [David Carlton ] [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods > [Fwd: RFA: abstract out thread compilation code] > [Fwd: superfluous line in hpread.c] > [Jim Blandy ] RFA: abstract out thread compilation code > [Jim Blandy ] RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too > [Jim Blandy ] Re: RFA: test GDB's ability to I _think_ these all went in. > [PATCH RFC] Character set support Done. > [PATCH/RFA] Add new readline.exp test for operate-and-get-next Done. > [RFA/MI testsuite] Add pthreads tests Done now I think. > [RFA/controversial] move bp by line number past the prologue Definitely still pending. > [RFA] 2nd send: Solve the watchpoint failures on second run. I think this went in 5.2.1 and trunk. > [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods Done as above... > [patch/5.3, rfa:testsuite] Fix $fp and $pc in display command Didn't you commit that? > [patch] Fix to processing end of function stab in dbxread.c I think this patch should go in... > [rfa/testsuite] more tests in gdb.c++/m-static Think this did. > [rfa] Symbol hashing (for the last time?) Wow, this is old. Yes, this went in. > adding namespace support to GDB Well, the issue is still outstanding, but I don't know what message this is. I would know if our mailing lists were searchable by something besides ht://Dig... > gdb vs readline, 1line patch Went in. > references to uninitialized static const members Went in, I think. > superfluous line in hpread.c Went in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer