Re: Outstanding?

David Carlton
2002-09-27T16:40:34Z

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:16:19 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:

> My pending / sep mail boxes contain the attached. If you see
> something that has been resolved, let me know.

I think I've gone through and spotted all the ones that are my fault
(though, given their number, I probably missed some). If I'm grouping
messages together, they all refer to the same thing, so if I say "This
has been taken care of" it refers to all the messages right above it.
Basically, there's only one issue of mine that's open right now.

> DWARF-2, static data members
> [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] [RFA] DWARF-2, static
> data members
> [RFA] DWARF-2, static data members

This is still outstanding. It's the only thing here that is
outstanding; I think the patch is pretty obvious and I would prefer to
get it in before 5.3, if possible, but it's not a critical situation.
(Basicaly, GCC and GDB both make the same mistake, so everything works
fine now.)

> [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] Re: [RFA] dwarf2read.c:

I'm not sure what this is, so I wouldn't worry about it: it's
doubtless the same as one of the other messages cited.

> [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] Re: [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods
> [David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU>] [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods
> [RFA] dwarf2read.c: set TYPE_DOMAIN_TYPE correctly for methods

This has been taken care of.

> [Fwd: superfluous line in hpread.c]
> superfluous line in hpread.c

This has been taken care of.

> dwarf2_build_psymtabs should check that .debug_line exists

This has been taken care of.

> [RFA] convert blocks to dictionaries, phase 1, main part
> [RFA] convert blocks to dictionaries, phase 1, mdebugread.c
> [RFC] environment.c
> adding namespace support to GDB

This is being pulled back and reworked.

> [RFA] delete BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT

Jim Blandy has responded to it, and right now it's on hold while
issues he raised get worked out. (It's not a bug, so there's
certainly no reason to worry about it before 5.3 gets released.)

> [rfa/c++-testsuite]: printing out methods
> [rfa/c++testsuite] (was Re: patch for PR gdb/574)
> [rfa/c++testsuite] (was patch for PR gdb/574)
> [rfa/testsuite] more tests in gdb.c++/m-static

These have been taken care of.

> fix for gdb/635
> references to uninitialized static const members

This has been taken care of.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu