Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb v7.0 - user defined command's document section - space  prefixed end
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <hd1ji7$sea$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091103195130.GA19931@caradoc.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:43:13AM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> > I noticed my scripts didn't work under v7.0 only when I saw this bug in
>> > launchpad. I guess I am not the only one who has indented "ends" this way
>> > :)
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/461594
>> 
>> If you could maybe help us a little bit, and track down the author
>> of the patch that introduced the change of behavior, and then ask
>> him whether the change was intended?
> 
> I believe it was:
> 
> 2009-08-03  Jim Ingham  <jingham@apple.com>
>             Vladimir Prus  <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> 
>         Refactor reading of commands
> 
>         * defs.h (read_command_lines_1): Declare.
>         * cli/cli-script.c (read_next_line): Only return string,
>         do not process.
>         (process_next_line): New, extracted from read_next_line.
>         (recurse_read_control_structure): Take a function pointer to the
>         read function.
>         (get_command_line) Pass the read_next_line as reader function
>         into recurse_read_control_structure.
>         (read_command_lines_1): New, extracted from...
>         (read_command_lines): ...here.

I don't think that the patch associated to the above changelog entry
is directly responsible -- consider:

-      val = read_next_line (&next, current_cmd->control_type != python_control);
+      val = process_next_line (read_next_line_func (), &next, 
+                              current_cmd->control_type != python_control);

read_next_line already used to took process_commands parameter, and process_next_line
was nothing but "Extract Function" refactoring, so it did not change that.

The process_commands parameter was added to read_next_line for exactly the reason
Tom suggested -- to support Python. When parsing 'python' command we need to skip
all the way to the 'end' without stripping indentation. And when not parsing 'python'
command, process_commands should be set. Therefore, here's the patch that should fix
this problem.  Grep claims no other problematic places.

OK?

- Volodya

Index: gdb/cli/cli-script.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/cli/cli-script.c,v
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -p -r1.53 cli-script.c
--- gdb/cli/cli-script.c        3 Aug 2009 12:26:37 -0000       1.53
+++ gdb/cli/cli-script.c        6 Nov 2009 16:40:12 -0000
@@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ document_command (char *comname, int fro
     error (_("Command \"%s\" is built-in."), comfull);

   sprintf (tmpbuf, "Type documentation for \"%s\".", comfull);
-  doclines = read_command_lines (tmpbuf, from_tty, 0);
+  doclines = read_command_lines (tmpbuf, from_tty, 1);

   if (c->doc)
     xfree (c->doc);












  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-06 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-28  6:12 James Pandavan
2009-11-03 14:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-11-03 18:58   ` James Pandavan
2009-11-03 19:43     ` Joel Brobecker
2009-11-03 19:51       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-03 22:03         ` Jim Ingham
2009-11-06 21:42         ` Vladimir Prus [this message]
2009-11-06 21:49           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-07  1:14             ` Vladimir Prus
2009-11-13 23:41               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-19  7:17                 ` Vladimir Prus
2009-11-04 20:47       ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-04 21:07         ` Paul Koning
2009-11-04 21:18           ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='hd1ji7$sea$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox