Re: [FYI] tutorial for process record and reverse debugging

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

Thanks Marc, I think I got you mean.  You mean is when the user don't
want keep play in replay mode, we give him a way to go the the record
mode directly.  I think this idea is not bad.

Michael, what do you think about it?

Thanks,
Hui

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 21:06, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
>> [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Hui Zhu
>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 8:57 AM
>> To: Marc Khouzam
>> Cc: Michael Snyder; gdb@sourceware.org
>> Subject: Re: [FYI] tutorial for process record and reverse debugging
>>
>> > But from reading the tutorial I see that it may be of
>> interest in some situations.
>> > What bothers me though is that one must disable all
>> breakpoints and then re-enable
>> > them.  This can be a bit of an annoyance, especially if
>> some bps were already disabled.
>> > I got to wonder if this doesn't call for a new command;
>> something like
>> > "record live", which would take us to the end of the
>> recording while not needing the
>> > user to deal with existing breakpoints.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > Marc
>> >
>>
>> Sorry Marc,  I cannot understand it.   Could you please tell me which
>> status need "disable all breakpoints and then re-enable them"?
>
> In the tutorial, around the middle of section
> "Continue, reverse-continue, and breakpoints"
> it mentions that after doing some reverse execution, we may be
> "now ready to resume where we left off".
>
> From what I understand this means that the user may decide that she
> is done with reverse execution and wants to go back to executing
> the live program.  To do this, we need to disable all bps, do a
> 'continue' and then (optionally) re-enable all bps.
>
> If going straight to the end of the recording log is a valuable
> feature, I was thinking it may deserve its own command.
>
> Ultimately, I'm hoping that with such a command, we can then see
> if we can have PRecord directly jump from recorded execution
> to live execution without stopping.
>
> I'm hoping to get opinions from you experts, as I'm not sure it is
> a good idea.
>
> Marc
>