From: "Jakob Engblom" <jakob@virtutech.com>
To: <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [FYI] tutorial for process record and reverse debugging
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00a501ca5613$37d69ea0$a783dbe0$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC5157AEC0C7@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
> > FWIW, early versions of UndoDB operated in "Marc-mode". We
> > changed it
> > because replay mode and record are quite different,
> > particularly w.r.t.
> > to the program's interaction with the outside world. "Silent"
> > transition
> > from replay to record mode could be quite confusing/surprising.
>
> In cases where the program does interact with the outside world,
> I agree that "auto-mode" could be confusing. In fact, "record mode"
> may not be the one we want in this case either. For instance, in
> some cases I may want to re-execute instructions that affect the outside
> world, even if I'm gone backwards. In this case I would want to use
> the recorded data to go backwards, but never to go forward (never use
> "replay mode").
Well, it actually can be made to work:
* Make sure the target is isolated, and that the debugger system can catch
anything going to the outside. This is trivial in a simulator or VM.
* When working with past time, don't send on things to the outside world. This
means reverse, replay, and going back again.
* When in progression forward, do connect to the outside world. The only problem
here are time-outs.
Obviously, my favorite solution is to just get around the entire problem by
including a sufficient component of the world inside the reversible system,
inside a system simulator.
Best regards,
/jakob
_______________________________________________________
Jakob Engblom, PhD, Technical Marketing Manager
Virtutech Direct: +46 8 690 07 47
Drottningholmsvägen 22 Mobile: +46 709 242 646
11243 Stockholm Web: www.virtutech.com
Sweden
________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-26 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-17 23:48 Michael Snyder
2009-10-19 12:36 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-19 12:57 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-10-19 13:06 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-19 13:20 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-10-19 16:35 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-20 0:59 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-19 18:24 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-20 6:44 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-10-20 21:01 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-21 5:16 ` Greg Law
2009-10-21 15:40 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-10-24 19:29 ` Greg Law
2009-10-25 2:01 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-26 3:05 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-10-26 9:59 ` Jakob Engblom [this message]
2009-10-22 6:31 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-21 15:06 ` Marc Khouzam
2009-10-26 7:54 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-26 8:06 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-10-26 7:58 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-10-26 19:10 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-27 18:32 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-10-19 18:23 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-26 3:12 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-26 8:02 ` Jakob Engblom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00a501ca5613$37d69ea0$a783dbe0$@com' \
--to=jakob@virtutech.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox