From: Quality Quorum <qqi@theworld.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
Peter Barada <pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com>,
<Peter.Barada@motorola.com>, <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Torubles with remote stub for m68k
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.40.0206241835160.2838133-100000@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D179D6C.7040904@cygnus.com>
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > With gdb-5, if the stub doesn't use breakpoint registers, is it gdb's
> >> responsibility to save/restore the brekpoint across a 's' packet, or
> >> is that the stub's responsibility?
> >>
> >> Any help is appreciated!
> >
> >
> > If GDB sets the breakpoint using 'M' (or presumably 'X') commands, then
> > it is the client's responsibility to clear it. It would be nice to
> > know why that isn't happening. To observe it in action you can use
> > gdbserver on a GNU/Linux system...
>
> Try a:
>
> (gdb) maint print architecture OUTPUTFILE
>
> and check what the value of the single step macros are. Your specific
> m68k target (configured as?) may have software single step settings that
> contradict what the target supports.
BTW, it will be nice to have this feature dynamically configurable.
>
> cf gdb/274.
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=274
>
> Andrew
>
>
Thanks,
Aleksey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-24 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-24 12:46 [MI/testsuite] mi_gdb_test: expected result priority? Keith Seitz
2002-06-24 13:20 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-06-24 14:04 ` Torubles with remote stub for m68k Peter Barada
2002-06-24 14:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-24 14:40 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-24 14:56 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-24 15:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-24 15:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-24 15:35 ` Quality Quorum [this message]
2002-06-25 7:53 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 10:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-25 9:38 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 13:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-25 10:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 8:13 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 8:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 8:32 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 8:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 13:43 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SGI.4.40.0206241835160.2838133-100000@shell01.TheWorld.com \
--to=qqi@theworld.com \
--cc=Peter.Barada@motorola.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox