From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Peter Barada <pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com>,
Peter.Barada@motorola.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Torubles with remote stub for m68k
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020625170120.GA19950@branoic.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D189992.4030201@cygnus.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:25:54PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Try a:
> >>
> >>(gdb) maint print architecture OUTPUTFILE
> >>
> >>and check what the value of the single step macros are.
>
> > Your specific
> >>m68k target (configured as?) may have software single step settings that
> >>contradict what the target supports.
>
> How did you configure your m68k target?
>
> >Ok, and what do I look for in the dump? I see:
> >
> >gdbarch_dump: MEMORY_INSERT_BREAKPOINT(addr, contents_cache) #
> >(default_memory_insert_breakpoint (addr, contents_cache))
> >gdbarch_dump: MEMORY_REMOVE_BREAKPOINT(addr, contents_cache) #
> >(default_memory_remove_breakpoint (addr, contents_cache))
> >
> >But what else should I look for? I don't see anything that has 'step' in
> >the name.
>
> SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P and SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP.
>
> Neither appear to be defined by the m68k targets. This indicates that
> the m68k [in current gdb] does not support software single step.
Peter was originally talking about memory (software) breakpoints, not
software single step; are these important in that case?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-25 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-24 12:46 [MI/testsuite] mi_gdb_test: expected result priority? Keith Seitz
2002-06-24 13:20 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-06-24 14:04 ` Torubles with remote stub for m68k Peter Barada
2002-06-24 14:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-24 14:40 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-24 14:56 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-24 15:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-24 15:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-24 15:35 ` Quality Quorum
2002-06-25 7:53 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 10:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-25 9:38 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 13:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-25 10:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-06-25 8:13 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 8:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 8:32 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 8:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 13:43 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020625170120.GA19950@branoic.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=Peter.Barada@motorola.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox