From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [MI/testsuite] mi_gdb_test: expected result priority?
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0206241238300.24067-100000@makita.cygnus.com> (raw)
Hi,
I've been writing some MI tests for all the stuff that I've been adding,
and I ran across an anomaly...
When mi_gdb_test actually calls expect, it does:
gdb_expect $tmt {
-re "\\*\\*\\* DOSEXIT code.*" {
if { $message != "" } {
fail "$message";
}
gdb_suppress_entire_file "GDB died";
return -1;
}
-re "Ending remote debugging.*$mi_gdb_prompt\[ \]*$" {
if ![isnative] then {
warning "Can`t communicate to remote target."
}
gdb_exit
gdb_start
set result -1
}
-re "(${question_string})$" {
send_gdb "$response_string\n";
exp_continue;
}
-re "Undefined.* command:.*$mi_gdb_prompt\[ \]*$" {
perror "Undefined command \"$command\"."
fail "$message"
set result 1
}
-re "Ambiguous command.*$mi_gdb_prompt\[ \]*$" {
perror "\"$command\" is not a unique command name."
fail "$message"
set result 1
}
-re "\[\r\n\]*($pattern)\[\r\n\]+$mi_gdb_prompt\[ \]*$" {
if ![string match "" $message] then {
pass "$message"
}
set result 0
}
The astute reader will notice that the _real_ expected pattern by the
caller is pre-empted by several other patterns. Therefore if one wanted to
write a test to check for the string "Ambiguous command", well, you'd
automatically get a fail. Likewise, if you wanted to write a test that
checked for the string "Undefined command: \"bogus\". Try \"help\"."
(which I am trying to do), one is screwed.
Is there any particular reason to not move the real expected result
pattern higher in the list (like to/near the top or something)??
Keith
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-24 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-24 12:46 Keith Seitz [this message]
2002-06-24 13:20 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-06-24 14:04 ` Torubles with remote stub for m68k Peter Barada
2002-06-24 14:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-24 14:40 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-24 14:56 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-24 15:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-24 15:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-24 15:35 ` Quality Quorum
2002-06-25 7:53 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 10:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-25 9:38 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 13:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-25 10:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 8:13 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 8:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 8:32 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 8:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 13:43 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.33.0206241238300.24067-100000@makita.cygnus.com \
--to=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox