From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Peter Barada <pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Torubles with remote stub for m68k
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D18D5E0.6030401@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200206242104.g5OL4pY06652@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com>
> (gdb) c
> Continuing.
> Sending packet: $Z0,3af78,2#7d...Ack
> Packet received:
> Packet Z0 (software-breakpoint) is NOT supported
> Sending packet: $m3af78,2#34...Ack
> Packet received: 4ab9
> Sending packet: $X3af78,0:#57...Ack
> Packet received: OK
> binary downloading suppported by target
> Sending packet: $X3af78,2:NA#e8...Ack
Set breakpoint at address 3af78.
> Packet received: OK
> Sending packet: $Hc0#db...Ack
> Packet received: ENN
> Sending packet: $c#63...Ack
> Packet received: T05thread:9;
> [New Thread 9]
> Sending packet: $g#67...Ack
> Packet received: 00000000000000000000006300000000004b47b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000012ca000012c240000000000000000005c34d4005c34c8000000000014a898000000000000000000000000000000007fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff7fffffffffffffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
For some reason here, GDB didn't pull all breakpoints. GDB normally
pulls all breakpoints as part of a stop. I suspect this is why the
breakpoint is still in memory when you go to SI - GDB doesn't think it
needs to pull any breakpoints.
> Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
Is the target sitting on a breakpoint? If it is GDB should report that
breakpoint but it hasn't.
What is the raw value of the PC as found in the G packet (rather than
what $pc displays at this point?). The m68k is one of the decr pc after
break targets [true] so likely it is getting that wrong.
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-25 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-24 12:46 [MI/testsuite] mi_gdb_test: expected result priority? Keith Seitz
2002-06-24 13:20 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-06-24 14:04 ` Torubles with remote stub for m68k Peter Barada
2002-06-24 14:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-24 14:40 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-24 14:56 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-24 15:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-24 15:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-24 15:35 ` Quality Quorum
2002-06-25 7:53 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 10:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-25 9:38 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 13:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-06-25 10:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 8:13 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 8:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 8:32 ` Peter Barada
2002-06-25 8:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-06-25 13:43 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D18D5E0.6030401@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox