* Need current information for (old) --with-cpu flag in configure.in.
@ 2007-02-21 22:22 Anmol Paralkar-B07584
2007-02-22 4:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anmol Paralkar-B07584 @ 2007-02-21 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Hello,
(I am working on gdb-6.6). In rs6000-tdep.c, we have the comment:
(Above the line: static struct variant variants[] =)
/* ...
If you add entries to this table, please be sure to allow the new
value as an argument to the --with-cpu flag, in configure.in. */
However, the "--with-cpu" flag is missing in gdb-6.6/configure.in.
Please could you let me know the change intended here to any of the
configure scripts when adding a new cpu?
Thanks & Regards,
Anmol P. Paralkar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Need current information for (old) --with-cpu flag in configure.in.
2007-02-21 22:22 Need current information for (old) --with-cpu flag in configure.in Anmol Paralkar-B07584
@ 2007-02-22 4:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-22 11:49 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-02-22 4:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anmol Paralkar-B07584; +Cc: gdb
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:57:05PM -0600, Anmol Paralkar-B07584 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (I am working on gdb-6.6). In rs6000-tdep.c, we have the comment:
> (Above the line: static struct variant variants[] =)
>
> /* ...
>
> If you add entries to this table, please be sure to allow the new
> value as an argument to the --with-cpu flag, in configure.in. */
>
> However, the "--with-cpu" flag is missing in gdb-6.6/configure.in.
>
> Please could you let me know the change intended here to any of the
> configure scripts when adding a new cpu?
To be honest, I have no idea what that comment is referring to.
--with-cpu only affects GCC, not GDB.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Need current information for (old) --with-cpu flag in configure.in.
2007-02-22 4:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2007-02-22 11:49 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2007-02-22 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: Anmol Paralkar-B07584, gdb
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:57:05PM -0600, Anmol Paralkar-B07584 wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > (I am working on gdb-6.6). In rs6000-tdep.c, we have the comment:
> > (Above the line: static struct variant variants[] =)
> >
> > /* ...
> >
> > If you add entries to this table, please be sure to allow the new
> > value as an argument to the --with-cpu flag, in configure.in. */
> >
> > However, the "--with-cpu" flag is missing in gdb-6.6/configure.in.
> >
> > Please could you let me know the change intended here to any of the
> > configure scripts when adding a new cpu?
>
> To be honest, I have no idea what that comment is referring to.
> --with-cpu only affects GCC, not GDB.
Could be configure.tgt, but seems unlikely.
The comment dates back to before the present repository
was created in 1999. It could conceivably have been cut/pasted
from gcc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-21 22:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-21 22:22 Need current information for (old) --with-cpu flag in configure.in Anmol Paralkar-B07584
2007-02-22 4:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-22 11:49 ` Michael Snyder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox