From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-27844-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30569 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2007 22:02:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 30543 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2007 22:02:15 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:02:08 +0000
Received: from dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.95] helo=caradoc.them.org) 	by nevyn.them.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) 	(envelope-from <drow@false.org>) 	id 1HJzXJ-0000aM-3h; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:02:05 -0500
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1HJzXI-00056L-9Y; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:02:04 -0500
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:09:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Anmol Paralkar-B07584 <b07584@freescale.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Need current information for (old) --with-cpu flag in configure.in.
Message-ID: <20070221220204.GA19029@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Anmol Paralkar-B07584 <b07584@freescale.com>, 	gdb@sourceware.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702211523340.10056@ld0159-tx32.am.freescale.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702211523340.10056@ld0159-tx32.am.freescale.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2

On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:57:05PM -0600, Anmol Paralkar-B07584 wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>  (I am working on gdb-6.6). In rs6000-tdep.c, we have the comment:
>  (Above the line: static struct variant variants[] =)
> 
>  /* ...
> 
>    If you add entries to this table, please be sure to allow the new
>    value as an argument to the --with-cpu flag, in configure.in.  */
> 
>  However, the "--with-cpu" flag is missing in gdb-6.6/configure.in.
> 
>  Please could you let me know the change intended here to any of the
>  configure scripts when adding a new cpu?

To be honest, I have no idea what that comment is referring to.
--with-cpu only affects GCC, not GDB.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery