From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15006 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2007 22:22:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 14990 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2007 22:22:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.palmsource.com (HELO mx2.palmsource.com) (12.7.175.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:22:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.domain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073FB123E64; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:21:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.palmsource.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.palmsource.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09323-08-7; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:21:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ussunex01.palmsource.com (unknown [192.168.101.9]) by mx2.palmsource.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C66123E5F; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:21:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from 192.168.92.81 ([192.168.92.81]) by ussunex01.palmsource.com ([192.168.101.9]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.palmsource.com ([10.0.20.17]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:21:44 +0000 Received: from svmsnyderlnx by owa.palmsource.com; 21 Feb 2007 14:21:44 -0800 Subject: Re: Need current information for (old) --with-cpu flag in configure.in. From: Michael Snyder To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Anmol Paralkar-B07584 , gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070221220204.GA19029@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070221220204.GA19029@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:49:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1172096504.9824.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:57:05PM -0600, Anmol Paralkar-B07584 wrote: > > Hello, > > > > (I am working on gdb-6.6). In rs6000-tdep.c, we have the comment: > > (Above the line: static struct variant variants[] =) > > > > /* ... > > > > If you add entries to this table, please be sure to allow the new > > value as an argument to the --with-cpu flag, in configure.in. */ > > > > However, the "--with-cpu" flag is missing in gdb-6.6/configure.in. > > > > Please could you let me know the change intended here to any of the > > configure scripts when adding a new cpu? > > To be honest, I have no idea what that comment is referring to. > --with-cpu only affects GCC, not GDB. Could be configure.tgt, but seems unlikely. The comment dates back to before the present repository was created in 1999. It could conceivably have been cut/pasted from gcc.