FW: (Another) Segfault in varobj.c

FW: (Another) Segfault in varobj.c

[Robert Norton]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Roberts [mailto:nickrob@snap.net.nz] 
> Sent: 07 August 2007 13:13
> To: Robert Norton
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: (Another) Segfault in varobj.c

> I can't say how risky it would be, I don't even understand 
> why you would rather
> backport to 6.6 than update to 6.7.  

I didn't think 6.7 had been released yet?

> If you do need to be 
> selective about the
> changes, I would just suggest including those from mi-cmd-var.c/h too.

Thanks.

> -- 
> Nick                                           
> http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
> 
> 

Re: FW: (Another) Segfault in varobj.c

[Nick Roberts]

 > > I can't say how risky it would be, I don't even understand 
 > > why you would rather
 > > backport to 6.6 than update to 6.7.  
 > 
 > I didn't think 6.7 had been released yet?

No but it was scheduled for release in July.  I think current CVS is fairly
stable and recent changes have been conservative, so you probably could just
merge to that and get better results than with 6.6.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob