From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13171 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2007 21:47:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 13039 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2007 21:47:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:47:38 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (34.40.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.40.34]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6753D9A13; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:47:35 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC4BD8FC6D; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:47:33 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18104.59508.761105.593329@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:47:00 -0000 To: "Robert Norton" Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FW: (Another) Segfault in varobj.c In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.50.7 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 > > I can't say how risky it would be, I don't even understand > > why you would rather > > backport to 6.6 than update to 6.7. > > I didn't think 6.7 had been released yet? No but it was scheduled for release in July. I think current CVS is fairly stable and recent changes have been conservative, so you probably could just merge to that and get better results than with 6.6. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob