From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14870 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2007 13:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 14696 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2007 13:21:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mms1.broadcom.com (HELO mms1.broadcom.com) (216.31.210.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:21:32 +0000 Received: from [10.10.64.154] by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.1)); Tue, 07 Aug 2007 06:21:22 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 6B5CFB92-F616-4477-B110-55F967A57302 Received: by mail-irva-10.broadcom.com (Postfix, from userid 47) id F14352AF; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-irva-8.broadcom.com (mail-irva-8 [10.10.64.221]) by mail-irva-10.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1C72AE for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-irva-12.broadcom.com (mail-irva-12.broadcom.com [10.10.64.146]) by mail-irva-8.broadcom.com (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id FNS50385; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NT-IRVA-0752.brcm.ad.broadcom.com ( nt-irva-0752.brcm.ad.broadcom.com [10.8.194.67]) by mail-irva-12.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A33269CA3 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: FW: (Another) Segfault in varobj.c Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: From: "Robert Norton" To: gdb@sourceware.org X-WSS-ID: 6AA6AE5835W3641053-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Roberts [mailto:nickrob@snap.net.nz]=20 > Sent: 07 August 2007 13:13 > To: Robert Norton > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: (Another) Segfault in varobj.c > I can't say how risky it would be, I don't even understand=20 > why you would rather > backport to 6.6 than update to 6.7.=20=20 I didn't think 6.7 had been released yet? > If you do need to be=20 > selective about the > changes, I would just suggest including those from mi-cmd-var.c/h too. Thanks. > --=20 > Nick=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob >=20 >=20