Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: WIP: Register doco
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D3EC951.1060302@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <npr8ht3i2h.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>

> If this section needs an example then (given MarkK's observation about
>> the i387) then either d10v's two stack pointers or the SH's bank
>> registers.  Neither of these are especially complicated.
> 
> 
> But... but the IA-32's FP and MMX hair is, like, the canonical
> motivation for the cooked/raw distinction.  You've said repeatedly
> that a GDB developer needs to understand this distinction.  That makes
> it a *good* example, right?  I think it's one of the best ---
> especially since it's something familiar to a lot more people than the
> d10v and the SH.

The original motivation for this model was work by David Taylor for an 
architecture that dual ported all of memory (memory == register). 
Additional motivations came from SH4 (sh5 proved the model), d10v and 
MIPS.  The i386 was but a blip on the horizon.

Given we're struggling amonst ourselves with the IA-32 I think that 
suggests it is a very poor choice for an example.  Especially given 
there are better cleaner examples to be had using other familar 
architectures.  I would assume this is why people like H&P chose DLX 
when describing CPU architectures.

enjoy,
Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-24 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-19 17:31 Andrew Cagney
2002-07-19 20:11 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-20 11:39   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-20 11:36     ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-20 13:41       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-20 15:26         ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-21  9:41           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-21 10:04             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-22  9:38               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-22 10:30                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-23 16:25             ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-23 17:34               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-23 20:45                 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-24  8:35                   ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-07-24 22:08                     ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-25  8:13                       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-23 21:17                 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-24  9:09                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-24 22:03                     ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-25  8:11                       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-22 14:39         ` Mark Kettenis
2002-07-22 14:41         ` Mark Kettenis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D3EC951.1060302@ges.redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox