From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: WIP: Register doco
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D3EC951.1060302@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <npr8ht3i2h.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
> If this section needs an example then (given MarkK's observation about
>> the i387) then either d10v's two stack pointers or the SH's bank
>> registers. Neither of these are especially complicated.
>
>
> But... but the IA-32's FP and MMX hair is, like, the canonical
> motivation for the cooked/raw distinction. You've said repeatedly
> that a GDB developer needs to understand this distinction. That makes
> it a *good* example, right? I think it's one of the best ---
> especially since it's something familiar to a lot more people than the
> d10v and the SH.
The original motivation for this model was work by David Taylor for an
architecture that dual ported all of memory (memory == register).
Additional motivations came from SH4 (sh5 proved the model), d10v and
MIPS. The i386 was but a blip on the horizon.
Given we're struggling amonst ourselves with the IA-32 I think that
suggests it is a very poor choice for an example. Especially given
there are better cleaner examples to be had using other familar
architectures. I would assume this is why people like H&P chose DLX
when describing CPU architectures.
enjoy,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-24 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-19 17:31 Andrew Cagney
2002-07-19 20:11 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-20 11:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-20 11:36 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-20 13:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-20 15:26 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-21 9:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-21 10:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-22 9:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-22 10:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-23 16:25 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-23 17:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-23 20:45 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-24 8:35 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-07-24 22:08 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-25 8:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-23 21:17 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-24 9:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-24 22:03 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-25 8:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-22 14:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-07-22 14:41 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D3EC951.1060302@ges.redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox