Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARM and virtual/raw registers
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 06:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CDFBBF3.7080700@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205131234.NAA27740@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>

> 
> OK, I'm trying this general approach.  One major failure, unfortunately.
> 
> The remote-sim code has:
> 
>   else if (REGISTER_NAME (regno) != NULL
>            && *REGISTER_NAME (regno) != '\0')
>     {
>       char buf[MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE];
>       int nr_bytes;
>       if (REGISTER_SIM_REGNO (regno) >= 0)
>         nr_bytes = sim_fetch_register (gdbsim_desc,
>                                        REGISTER_SIM_REGNO (regno),
>                                        buf, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regno));
>      ...
>       supply_register (regno, buf);
> 
> Which is precisely the opposite of what I want: sim_fetch_register needs 
> to fetch the raw (uncooked) registers, which is precisely the set that 
> don't have names :-(
> 
> REGISTER_SIM_REGNO doesn't help, because we never get to the code for the 
> registers I need.

Want it fixed?  Next to no targets define the macro so changing the the 
behavour - make REGISTER_SIM_REGNO totally responsible for the decision 
is straight forward.

(In fact, why didn't I do this before).

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-13 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-09  7:31 Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09  9:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:01   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 11:52     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10  3:45       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10  7:48         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 12:07           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11  7:05             ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 14:52               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  7:20                 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:25                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:30                     ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:51                       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10  9:29       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10 11:42         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11  6:16           ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 11:41           ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 13:36             ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  7:11               ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  7:40                 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  9:03                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 11:31                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:07                 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:25                   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:41                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13  5:35                   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-13  6:13                     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-05-13  6:18                       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 10:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:36   ` Richard Earnshaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CDFBBF3.7080700@cygnus.com \
    --to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox