Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARM and virtual/raw registers
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CDAAD10.9000704@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205091431.PAA15329@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>

> Ok, so it's clear that the current ARM code for handling virtual and raw 
> registers is wrong...
> 
> So the question is, what does it need to be?
> 
> The answer is that I'm not quite sure, since there are a number of factors 
> involved here.
> 
> 1) FPA registers are multi-precision -- that is, they are modal, holding 
> information about the type of result in the register at any particular 
> time.  The extra information is used to enable correct support of type 
> conversions with signalling NaNs.

[And I thought MIPS was bad :-)]

So an FP register could contain a single, double, ... and each would be 
represented differently - single, for instance, would not be stored as a 
rounded double?

I think the Alpha does this for int values - it has some really strange 
to/from register/int code.

If this is the only problem, then the new REGISTER_TO_VALUE et.al. 
methods should address the problem.

Those methods, do, however, assume that the format of a register spilt 
into memory is identical to the layout of the h/w register supplied by 
the OS / H/W / ...  Hmm, ...

> 2) The format of that information can depend on the hardware present, or, 
> if absent, on the emulator being used (different emulators handle this in 
> different ways).


> 3) Some of the emulators use three words to hold the raw information, some 
> use four.  RDP returns uses four words.
> 
> 4) When a floating point value is stored in memory the format of that 
> memory may depend on the instruction used to store it.  For example, the 
> sfmfd instruction used in a prologue sequence will store three words (as 
> would stfe), but there may be information in the unused bits that 
> indicates the type of the value in the register.  The format of this 
> memory may, or may not, be the same as the three-word register information 
> mentioned in 3) above.

So the way the ARM spills its FP registers into memory may not 
necessarily match the equivalent h/w register?

Does the ARM always spill these registers in the same way (at least for 
a given ISA/ABI combination?) - if GDB is fetching a saved register from 
the stack, it knows what the format is.

> 5) All of the above is poorly documented ;-(
> 
> 6) Selecting the correct conversion routine may involve some inspired 
> guess-work :-)

Andrew


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-05-09 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-09  7:31 Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09  9:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:01   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 11:52     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10  3:45       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10  7:48         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 12:07           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11  7:05             ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 14:52               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  7:20                 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:25                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:30                     ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:51                       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10  9:29       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10 11:42         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11  6:16           ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 11:41           ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 13:36             ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  7:11               ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  7:40                 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  9:03                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 11:31                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:07                 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:25                   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:41                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13  5:35                   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-13  6:13                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13  6:18                       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 10:08 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-05-09 10:36   ` Richard Earnshaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CDAAD10.9000704@cygnus.com \
    --to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox