From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARM and virtual/raw registers
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 06:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200205111316.OAA13602@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 May 2002 14:42:58 EDT." <3CDC14B2.4030407@cygnus.com>
> > If, as I understand your previous postings to imply, having pseudo
> > registers stored in the cache is wrong, why does regcache_read() allow
> > them?
> >
> > regcache_read (int rawnum, char *buf)
> > {
> > gdb_assert (rawnum >= 0 && rawnum < (NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS));
>
> Lets just pretend you didn't see that :-)
> Some existing mechanisms store pseudo-register values in the cache. In
> addition ``NUM_REGS'' is overloaded - it controls too many aspects of
> GDB - num regs in G packet, num regs to save across an inferior function
> call, ...
So how about a comment saying pseudo regs shouldn't be in the cache!
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-11 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-09 7:31 Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 9:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:01 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 11:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 3:45 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10 7:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 12:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11 7:05 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 14:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 7:20 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 8:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 8:30 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 8:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 9:29 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10 11:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11 6:16 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2002-05-11 11:41 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 13:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 7:11 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 7:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 9:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 11:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 8:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 8:25 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 8:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13 5:35 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-13 6:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13 6:18 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 10:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:36 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200205111316.OAA13602@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox