From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARM and virtual/raw registers
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 12:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CDC1A85.4090603@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CDBDDDB.5000108@cygnus.com>
>> Now obviously, in order to do all this correctly the stack-frame groveller will have to record the information as it unwinds the stack in some private data; but creating this information is part of the stack-unwinding process.
>
> Yes. The arm would need to implement a custom get_saved_register() architecture method.
>
> Rather than normalize the registers on the way in. Consider normalizing them them on the way out via a pseudo. Doing this would mean that the raw register wouldn't be directly visible and the layer below regcache wouldn't need to normalize anything.
[to expand a little]
Two target side interfaces (at least) don't have mechanisms for
re-aranging (normalizing) registers on the way in:
- sim
- remote
I suspect that at least short term, doing everything on the gdb-core
side will be easier.
Having the very raw data in the cache may also prove better for
debugging - both the raw (in cache) and the normalized (via register
read/write) formats are available. Perhaphs also look at the i387 which
normalizes things on the way in (and its bug count).
enjoy,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-10 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-09 7:31 Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 9:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:01 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 11:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 3:45 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10 7:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 12:07 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-05-11 7:05 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 14:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 7:20 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 8:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 8:30 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 8:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 9:29 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10 11:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11 6:16 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 11:41 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 13:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 7:11 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 7:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 9:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 11:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 8:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 8:25 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12 8:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13 5:35 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-13 6:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13 6:18 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 10:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:36 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CDC1A85.4090603@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox