Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ARM and virtual/raw registers
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 12:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CDC1A85.4090603@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CDBDDDB.5000108@cygnus.com>

>> Now obviously, in order to do all this correctly the stack-frame groveller will have to record the information as it unwinds the stack in some private data; but creating this information is part of the stack-unwinding process.

> 
> Yes.  The arm would need to implement a custom get_saved_register() architecture method.
> 
> Rather than normalize the registers on the way in.  Consider normalizing them them on the way out via a pseudo.  Doing this would mean that the raw register wouldn't be directly visible and the layer below regcache wouldn't need to normalize anything.

[to expand a little]

Two target side interfaces (at least) don't have mechanisms for 
re-aranging (normalizing) registers on the way in:
	- sim
	- remote
I suspect that at least short term, doing everything on the gdb-core 
side will be easier.

Having the very raw data in the cache may also prove better for 
debugging - both the raw (in cache) and the normalized (via register 
read/write) formats are available.  Perhaphs also look at the i387 which 
normalizes things on the way in (and its bug count).

enjoy,
Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-10 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-09  7:31 Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09  9:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:01   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 11:52     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10  3:45       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10  7:48         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10 12:07           ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-05-11  7:05             ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 14:52               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  7:20                 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:25                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:30                     ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:51                       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-10  9:29       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-10 11:42         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-11  6:16           ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 11:41           ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 13:36             ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  7:11               ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  7:40                 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  9:03                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 11:31                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:07                 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12  8:25                   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-12  8:41                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13  5:35                   ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-13  6:13                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13  6:18                       ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 10:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-09 10:36   ` Richard Earnshaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CDC1A85.4090603@cygnus.com \
    --to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox