From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 13:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C3CBCB8.90401@redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 499 bytes --]
Hello,
I'm looking over all the things in my 5.1.1 folder and am beginning to
think that it might be better if instead just move onto 5.2. I really
don't know if it is worth all the effort (well mine and a few others) of
pulling those changes onto a branch. All the C++ fixes, the HP/UX host
stuff and so on.
For this to work, all the proposed release criteria for 5.2 would need
to be droped.
thoughts?
Either way, there needs to be a decision by the middle of next week.
enjoy,
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: TODO --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2934 bytes --]
GDB 5.2 - Fixes
===============
--
GDB 5.2 - New features
======================
--
GCC 3.0 ABI support (but hopefully sooner...).
--
Objective C/C++ support (but hopefully sooner...).
--
Import of readline 4.2
--
GDB 5.2 - Cleanups
==================
The following cleanups have been identified as part of GDB 5.2.
--
Remove old code that does not use ui_out functions and all the related
"ifdef"s. This also allows the elimination of -DUI_OUT from
Makefile.in and configure.in.
--
Compiler warnings.
Eliminate warnings for all targets on at least one host for one of the
-W flags. Flags up for debate include: -Wswitch -Wcomment -trigraphs
-Wtrigraphs -Wunused-function -Wunused-label -Wunused-variable
-Wunused-value -Wchar-subscripts -Wtraditional -Wshadow -Wcast-qual
-Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wconversion -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls
-Woverloaded-virtual -Winline
--
Deprecate, if not delete, the following:
register[]
register_valid[]
REGISTER_BYTE()
Replaced by, on the target side
supply_register()
and on core-gdb side:
{read,write}_register_gen()
Remote.c will need to use something
other than REGISTER_BYTE() and
REGISTER_RAW_SIZE() when unpacking
[gG] packets.
STORE_PSEUDO_REGISTER
FETCH_PSEUDO_REGISTER
Now handed by the methods
gdbarch_{read,write}_register()
which sits between core GDB and
the register cache.
REGISTER_CONVERTIBLE
REGISTER_CONVERT_TO_RAW
REGISTER_CONVERT_TO_VIRTUAL
I think these three are redundant.
gdbarch_register_{read,write} can
do any conversion it likes.
REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE
MAX_REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE
REGISTER_VIRTUAL_TYPE
I think these can be replaced by
the pair:
FRAME_REGISTER_TYPE(frame, regnum)
REGISTER_TYPE(regnum)
DO_REGISTERS_INFO
Replace with
FRAME_REGISTER_INFO (frame, ...)
REGISTER_SIM_REGNO()
If nothing else rename this so that
how it relates to rawreg and the
regnum is clear.
REGISTER_BYTES
The size of the cache can be computed
on the fly.
IS_TRAPPED_INTERNALVAR
The pseudo registers should eventually make
this redundant.
--
Obsolete the targets:
arm*-wince-pe
mips*-*-pe
sh*-*-pe
--
Obsolete the protocols:
RDB?
``As of version 5.3, WindRiver has removed the RDB server (RDB
protocol support is built into gdb).'' -- Till.
--
Restructure gdb directory tree so that it avoids any 8.3 and 14
filename problems.
--
Convert GDB build process to AUTOMAKE.
See also sub-directory configure below.
The current convention is (kind of) to use $(<header>_h) in all
dependency lists. It isn't done in a consistent way.
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-09 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-09 13:57 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-01-09 15:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 15:30 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-01-09 16:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-14 20:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-17 12:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-17 14:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-15 6:05 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-01-15 7:43 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C3CBCB8.90401@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox