From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15420.51052.85383.587125@localhost.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020109182054.B16868@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:57:12PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm looking over all the things in my 5.1.1 folder and am beginning to
> > think that it might be better if instead just move onto 5.2. I really
> > don't know if it is worth all the effort (well mine and a few others) of
> > pulling those changes onto a branch. All the C++ fixes, the HP/UX host
> > stuff and so on.
> >
> > For this to work, all the proposed release criteria for 5.2 would need
> > to be droped.
> >
> > thoughts?
> >
> > Either way, there needs to be a decision by the middle of next week.
>
> Well, we got GCC 3.0 ABI support off the New features list. ObjC/C++
> would push us back a long ways, and I don't remember what the
> complications with readline4.2 were.
None, I just didn't get a chance to do the import.
Elena
>
> I wouldn't be averse to a quick 5.2 release from the trunk, otherwise.
> There's a few things it would be nice to have done first - I have more
> C++ fixes, and the profiling patch has not AFAICR been committed yet.
> But there should be time.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-09 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-09 13:57 Andrew Cagney
2002-01-09 15:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 15:30 ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2002-01-09 16:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-14 20:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-17 12:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-17 14:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-15 6:05 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-01-15 7:43 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15420.51052.85383.587125@localhost.cygnus.com \
--to=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox