From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C43B0FF.9000506@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C3CBCB8.90401@redhat.com>
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking over all the things in my 5.1.1 folder and am beginning to think that it might be better if instead just move onto 5.2. I really don't know if it is worth all the effort (well mine and a few others) of pulling those changes onto a branch. All the C++ fixes, the HP/UX host stuff and so on.
>
> For this to work, all the proposed release criteria for 5.2 would need to be droped.
>
> thoughts?
>
> Either way, there needs to be a decision by the middle of next week.
Just a postscript to this. Because the FSF would like to be able to
spin out a manual based on a current release but are currently fixing
things I'll very likely end up spinning out a 5.1.1 or 5.1.0.2 (ulgh)
anyway. The latter is far far easier.
However I do still have a preference for cutting 5.2 rather than spend
lots of effort getting fixes into the 5.1 branch.
I guess the question I'm asking here is, how much stuff has been added
to the 5.1 branch that might break things making a fast 5.1.1 a high
risk activity.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-15 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-09 13:57 Andrew Cagney
2002-01-09 15:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 15:30 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-01-09 16:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-14 20:33 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-01-17 12:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-17 14:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-15 6:05 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-01-15 7:43 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C43B0FF.9000506@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox