From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050331205826.GA1590@white> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c535ab$Blat.v2.4$c21baac0@zahav.net.il>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:39:23AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:47:49 -0500
> > From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> > Cc: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
> >
> > The first approach seems good, I was just wondering if that would
> > slow things down? Aren't hardware watchpoints must faster than
> > software?
>
> With hardware watchpoints. the inferior runs at its normal speed. So
> how would it slow down things if we leave the watchpoint in place in
> that case?
Sorry, I re-read what you wrote and understand it a little better now.
I do have another question though. If GDB has another mecanism to
determine when hardware watchpoints go out of scope, why does it add the
scope watchpoint at all? Is it added and then never used? or does it
not serve a function at all in this case?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-31 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-25 16:12 Bob Rossi
2005-03-25 16:25 ` gdbserver question james osburn
2005-03-25 16:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-26 13:27 ` [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-26 13:44 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-27 14:10 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 21:57 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 22:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-28 22:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 22:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 0:43 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-29 1:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 1:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-29 2:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 21:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 21:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-03-29 21:47 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-30 5:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 21:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-30 20:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 0:49 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-31 4:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 19:59 ` Bob Rossi [this message]
2005-04-01 8:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 14:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-02 9:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-06 2:13 ` Bob Rossi
2005-04-06 3:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 2:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-31 4:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 6:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-31 19:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 23:29 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-30 5:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-30 0:29 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050331205826.GA1590@white \
--to=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox