From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c53207$Blat.v2.4$3def9b00@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050325161239.GA12231@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:12:39 -0500)
> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:12:39 -0500
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
>
> (gdb)
> -break-watch param
> ^done,wpt={number="2",exp="param"}
> (gdb)
> -exec-continue
> ^running
> (gdb)
> ~"Hardware watchpoint 2 deleted because the program has left the block \n"
> ~"in which its expression is valid.\n"
> *stopped,reason="exited",exit-code="02"
> (gdb)
>
> Is it just a bug that there is no 'watchpoint-scope' returned?
I think it's a bug, yes: there's one instance in breakpoint.c
(specifically, in the function insert_bp_location) that uses
printf_filtered instead of the ui_* functions to produce the warning
about a watchpoint that went out of scope. I think it should use the
same code that is used by watchpoint_check to produce a similar
warning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-26 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-25 16:12 Bob Rossi
2005-03-25 16:25 ` gdbserver question james osburn
2005-03-25 16:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-26 13:27 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-03-26 13:44 ` [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command Bob Rossi
2005-03-27 14:10 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 21:57 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 22:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-28 22:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 22:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 0:43 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-29 1:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 1:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-29 2:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 21:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 21:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-03-29 21:47 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-30 5:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 21:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-30 20:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 0:49 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-31 4:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 19:59 ` Bob Rossi
2005-04-01 8:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 14:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-02 9:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-06 2:13 ` Bob Rossi
2005-04-06 3:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 2:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-31 4:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 6:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-31 19:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 23:29 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-30 5:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-30 0:29 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01c53207$Blat.v2.4$3def9b00@zahav.net.il' \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox