From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050328224101.GA629@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050328225619.GB3413@white>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:56:19PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> (gdb) n
> Hardware watchpoint 2 deleted because the program has left the block
> in which its expression is valid.
> Segmentation fault
>
> The crash only happens sometimes. Although when I run it over and over,
> I will eventually get it.
>
> Here is the problem I found,
>
> (gdb) n
> Hardware watchpoint 2 deleted because the program has left the block
> in which its expression is valid.
> ==26644== Invalid write of size 4
> ==26644== at 0x80D9B32: insert_bp_location (breakpoint.c:1022)
> ==26644== by 0x80D9EDA: insert_breakpoints (breakpoint.c:1151)
> ==26644== by 0x8119620: proceed (infrun.c:774)
I envy you. I can't get valgrind to work with GDB; once I try to run a
child process, it falls over.
> So, basically, I can't figure out why the breakpoint field
> 'related_breakpoint' became in valid. I believe it was valid when the
> breakpoint was created, since the memset is there. However, at some
> point, it must have become invalid ...
The related breakpoint is supposed to be the scope breakpoint; I can't
see how they could become unpaired. You may want to run a debugger on
GDB, using a watchpoint to see what changes it?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-28 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-25 16:12 Bob Rossi
2005-03-25 16:25 ` gdbserver question james osburn
2005-03-25 16:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-26 13:27 ` [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-26 13:44 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-27 14:10 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 21:57 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 22:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-03-28 22:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 22:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 0:43 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-29 1:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 1:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-29 2:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 21:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 21:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-03-29 21:47 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-30 5:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 21:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-30 20:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 0:49 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-31 4:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 19:59 ` Bob Rossi
2005-04-01 8:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 14:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-02 9:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-06 2:13 ` Bob Rossi
2005-04-06 3:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 2:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-31 4:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 6:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-31 19:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 23:29 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-30 5:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-30 0:29 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050328224101.GA629@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox