From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050325161239.GA12231@white> (raw)
Hi,
I've been trying to understand and document the exec-async commands that
GDB sends to the FE. So far, I think I've understood them all, and
reproduced them. However, the "watchpoint-scope" one is giving me a hard time.
Here's the sample program,
int wpscope ( int param ) {
return param+1;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv){
return wpscope ( argc );
}
$ ../gdb -i=mi ./wpscope
(gdb)
-break-insert wpscope
^done,bkpt={number="1",type="breakpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",addr="0x08048357",func="wpscope",file="wpscope.c",line="2",times="0"}
(gdb)
-exec-run
^running
(gdb)
*stopped,reason="breakpoint-hit",bkptno="1",thread-id="0",frame={addr="0x08048357",func="wpscope",args=[{name="param",value="1"}],file="wpscope.c",line="2"}
(gdb)
-break-watch param
^done,wpt={number="2",exp="param"}
(gdb)
-exec-continue
^running
(gdb)
~"Hardware watchpoint 2 deleted because the program has left the block \n"
~"in which its expression is valid.\n"
*stopped,reason="exited",exit-code="02"
(gdb)
Is it just a bug that there is no 'watchpoint-scope' returned?
The 'break-watch' doco in the manual leads me to believe that I should
get back the "watchpoint-scope" when the hardware watchpoint was
deleted. However, I don't really have any clue if this is a bug or
desired behavior.
Any help would be appreciated, since hopefully I can better document the
reasons why such events would occur.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
next reply other threads:[~2005-03-25 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-25 16:12 Bob Rossi [this message]
2005-03-25 16:25 ` gdbserver question james osburn
2005-03-25 16:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-26 13:27 ` [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-26 13:44 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-27 14:10 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 21:57 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 22:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-28 22:54 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-28 22:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 0:43 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-29 1:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 1:51 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-29 2:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-29 21:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 21:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-03-29 21:47 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-30 5:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 21:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-30 20:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 0:49 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-31 4:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 19:59 ` Bob Rossi
2005-04-01 8:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-01 14:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-02 9:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-06 2:13 ` Bob Rossi
2005-04-06 3:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 2:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-31 4:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-31 6:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-31 19:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-29 23:29 ` Bob Rossi
2005-03-30 5:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-30 0:29 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050325161239.GA12231@white \
--to=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox