* Re: GNATS: gdb-prs@ -> gdb@?
2002-09-24 16:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-09-25 20:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-26 16:52 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-09-25 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1229 bytes --]
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:51:30PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Anyone know something about GNATS?
>>
>> I think I know why the ``send email to interested parties'' URL on the
>> GDB's GNATS web page contains:
>>
>> nobody@
>> The e-mail address of things like ``Responsible: unassigned'' get mapped
>> onto nobody@ because they can't be mapped onto nothing (That gets
>> remapped to unassigned@. True?). Same for a few others. I think we
>> can live with this one.
>>
>> gdb-prs@
>> The contact address for the ``net'' and ``unknown'' customers is gdb-prs@!
>>
>> What do people think of changing this? For instance, just setting it to
>> gdb@ or nobody@ (like most other things).
>
>
> nobody@ would be preferable to gdb@, I think...
>
>
>> I also don't remember the rationale behind gdb-gnats@ (where to send a
>> bug report) vs gdb-prs@ (where the bug reports appear). I suspect that
>> it is to stop people accidently re-sending to gdb-gnats?
>
>
> Isn't gdb-gnats input into the gnats DB, and gdb-prs output from it?
I think its configured.
The attached shows up a second problem. I can't reply to your reply as
the headers put it down as being from gdb-prs. Arrrg.
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: mailbox-message://ac131313@movemail/fsf/gdb/prs#780100 --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3728 bytes --]
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: nobody@sources.redhat.com
Cc: gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com,
Subject: Re: gdb/722: Encounter "__builtin_va_alist undeclared" during building GDB
Date: 26 Sep 2002 01:58:01 -0000
Message-ID: <20020926015801.2088.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
The following reply was made to PR gdb/722; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: shoang@northropgrumman.com
Cc: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb/722: Encounter "__builtin_va_alist undeclared" during building GDB
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:52:00 -0400
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:45:54AM -0000, shoang@northropgrumman.com wrote:
>
> >Number: 722
> >Category: gdb
> >Synopsis: Encounter "__builtin_va_alist undeclared" during building GDB
> >Confidential: no
> >Severity: critical
> >Priority: high
> >Responsible: unassigned
> >State: open
> >Class: sw-bug
> >Submitter-Id: net
> >Arrival-Date: Wed Sep 25 18:48:02 PDT 2002
> >Closed-Date:
> >Last-Modified:
> >Originator: Sonny Hoang
> >Release: 5.2.1
> >Organization:
> >Environment:
> SUN 4u running Sun OS Release 5.7
> >Description:
> I download and extract files into directory gdb5.2.1 then I go into that directory running "./configure sun4" then I enter "make". After a while of compiling, it gave me several errors in concat.c file saying:
>
> function `concat_length':
> `__builtin_va_alist' undeclared (first use in this function)
> function `concat_copy':
> `__builtin_va_alist' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> and etc.
>
> I don't know what to do. I need help please.
Sun4 is SunOS 4. Try using a solaris2 configuration triplet. Try
sparc-solaris2 maybe?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GNATS: gdb-prs@ -> gdb@?
2002-09-24 16:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-25 20:48 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-09-26 16:52 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-09-26 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb
See gdb/1.
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:51:30PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Anyone know something about GNATS?
>>
>> I think I know why the ``send email to interested parties'' URL on the
>> GDB's GNATS web page contains:
>>
>> nobody@
>> The e-mail address of things like ``Responsible: unassigned'' get mapped
>> onto nobody@ because they can't be mapped onto nothing (That gets
>> remapped to unassigned@. True?). Same for a few others. I think we
>> can live with this one.
>>
>> gdb-prs@
>> The contact address for the ``net'' and ``unknown'' customers is gdb-prs@!
>>
>> What do people think of changing this? For instance, just setting it to
>> gdb@ or nobody@ (like most other things).
>
>
> nobody@ would be preferable to gdb@, I think...
Nope. It is where GNAT's sends those useful CR changed messages. I
just did a number of changes to gdb/1 (with it set to nobody) and nobody
was informed of the changes (except myself and cgf).
>> I also don't remember the rationale behind gdb-gnats@ (where to send a
>> bug report) vs gdb-prs@ (where the bug reports appear). I suspect that
>> it is to stop people accidently re-sending to gdb-gnats?
>
>
> Isn't gdb-gnats input into the gnats DB, and gdb-prs output from it?
gdb-gnats is input, yes. gdb-prs is:
# Any line which begins with a `#' is considered a comment, and GNATS
# will ignore it.
#
# Each entry has the format:
#
# submitter:full submitter
name:type:response-time:contact:notify-others
#
# * submitter: The name of the site, customer, etc., sending the
# report in.
# * full submitter name: The description, like `Foo Widgets Inc.'.
# * submitter type: Can be contract type, level of expertise, etc.
# * response time: If configured with `NOTIFY' set to `TRUE', GNATS
# will use this field to schedule when at_pr should notify the
# gnats-admin and gnats-manager that the PR wasn't analyzed
# within the agreed response time.
# * contact: Principal contact for the submitter.
# * notify: Others who should be Cc'd on any PRs coming from
# this submitter.
#
#
#net:Net Users:net:-1:gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com:
net:Net Users:net:-1:nobody:
(ok that's an old copy of the file). It's a shame that there isn't a
BCC field.....
Still confused.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread